2009•Clinical PediatricsRequires access

Periurethral Cleaning Prior to Urinary Catheterization in Children: Sterile Water versus 10% Povidone-Iodine

Sami Al-Farsi, Maria G. Oliva, Robert Davidson, Susan E. Richardson, Savithiri Ratnapalan

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare urinary infection rate in children cleaned with sterile water versus a 10% povidone-iodine before bladder catheterization. METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled study of children requiring bladder catheterization in the emergency department whose parents consented to the study were randomly assigned to either of 2 groups, in which sterile water (the "sterile water" group) or 10% povidone-iodine (the "10% povidone-iodine" group) was to be used for peri-urethral cleansing prior to catheterization. RESULTS: The sterile water group had 92 patients and the povidone-iodine group had 94. Most children (87%) were under 12 months of age. Urine cultures were positive in 16% of children in the povidone-iodine group and in 18% in the water group. There was no significant difference in signs and symptoms between the 2 groups. There was no significant association between solution preparation and cultures on univariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning the periurethral area of children with sterile water prior to catheterization is not inferior to cleaning with povidone-iodine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare urinary infection rate in children cleaned with sterile water versus a 10% povidone-iodine before bladder catheterization. METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled study of children requiring bladder catheterization in the emergency department whose parents consented to the study were randomly assigned to either of 2 groups, in which sterile water (the "sterile water" group) or 10% povidone-iodine (the "10% povidone-iodine" group) was to be used for peri-urethral cleansing prior to catheterization. RESULTS: The sterile water group had 92 patients and the povidone-iodine group had 94. Most children (87%) were under 12 months of age. Urine cultures were positive in 16% of children in the povidone-iodine group and in 18% in the water group. There was no significant difference in signs and symptoms between the 2 groups. There was no significant association between solution preparation and cultures on univariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning the periurethral area of children with sterile water prior to catheterization is not inferior to cleaning with povidone-iodine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare urinary infection rate in children cleaned with sterile water versus a 10% povidone-iodine before bladder catheterization. METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled study of children requiring bladder catheterization in the emergency department whose parents consented to the study were randomly assigned to either of 2 groups, in which sterile water (the "sterile water" group) or 10% povidone-iodine (the "10% povidone-iodine" group) was to be used for peri-urethral cleansing prior to catheterization. RESULTS: The sterile water group had 92 patients and the povidone-iodine group had 94. Most children (87%) were under 12 months of age. Urine cultures were positive in 16% of children in the povidone-iodine group and in 18% in the water group. There was no significant difference in signs and symptoms between the 2 groups. There was no significant association between solution preparation and cultures on univariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning the periurethral area of children with sterile water prior to catheterization is not inferior to cleaning with povidone-iodine.

Key concepts: Medicine, Iodine, Urinary catheterization, Sterile water, Urine, Surgery, Univariate analysis, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Periurethral Cleaning Prior to Urinary Catheterization in Children: Sterile Water versus 10% Povidone-Iodine — Research Paper | ScholarLens