Leveraging speaker diarization for meeting recognition from distant microphones
Andreas Stolcke, Gerald Friedland, David Imseng
Abstract
Andreas Stolcke, Gerald Friedland, David Imseng
Abstract
We investigate using state-of-the-art speaker diarization output for speech recognition purposes. While it seems obvious that speech recognition could benefit from the output of speaker diarization (“Who spoke when”) for effective feature normalization and model adaptation, such benefits have remained elusive in the very challenging domain of meeting recognition from distant microphones. In this study, we show that recognition gains are possible by careful post-processing of the diarization output. Still, recognition accuracy may suffer when the underlying diarization system performs worse than expected, even compared to far less sophisticated speaker-clustering techniques. We obtain a more accurate and robust overall system by combining recognition output with multiple speaker segmentations and clusterings. We evaluate our methods on data from the 2009 NIST Rich Transcription meeting recognition evaluation.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigate using state-of-the-art speaker diarization output for speech recognition purposes. While it seems obvious that speech recognition could benefit from the output of speaker diarization (“Who spoke when”) for effective feature normalization and model adaptation, such benefits have remained elusive in the very challenging domain of meeting recognition from distant microphones. In this study, we show that recognition gains are possible by careful post-processing of the diarization output. Still, recognition accuracy may suffer when the underlying diarization system performs worse than expected, even compared to far less sophisticated speaker-clustering techniques. We obtain a more accurate and robust overall system by combining recognition output with multiple speaker segmentations and clusterings. We evaluate our methods on data from the 2009 NIST Rich Transcription meeting recognition evaluation.
Key concepts: Speaker diarisation, Speech recognition, Computer science, NIST, Speaker recognition, Normalization (sociology), Cluster analysis, Transcription (linguistics)