Critical Discourse Analysis
Teun A. van Dijk
Abstract
Teun A. van Dijk
Abstract
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA; better named critical discourse studies [CDS]) is a movement or perspective of multidisciplinary discourse studies that specifically focuses on the discursive reproduction of power abuse, such as sexism, racism, and other forms of social inequality, as well as the resistance against such domination. CDA/CDS is not a specific method of discourse studies but makes use of all relevant methods of the humanities and social sciences in the study of important social problems. Unlike most other approaches, the CDS framework presented here not only relates discourse structures to social structures but does so through a sociocognitive interface that links mental representations of communicative and other social situations and events with the cognitive structures underlying discourse. Power is conceptualized as control – for example, control of the structures of context, text, or talk, and thus indirectly of people's minds
OpenAlex reports 5417 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA; better named critical discourse studies [CDS]) is a movement or perspective of multidisciplinary discourse studies that specifically focuses on the discursive reproduction of power abuse, such as sexism, racism, and other forms of social inequality, as well as the resistance against such domination. CDA/CDS is not a specific method of discourse studies but makes use of all relevant methods of the humanities and social sciences in the study of important social problems. Unlike most other approaches, the CDS framework presented here not only relates discourse structures to social structures but does so through a sociocognitive interface that links mental representations of communicative and other social situations and events with the cognitive structures underlying discourse. Power is conceptualized as control – for example, control of the structures of context, text, or talk, and thus indirectly of people's minds
Key concepts: Critical discourse analysis, Sociology, Discourse analysis, Context (archaeology), Power (physics), Racism, Epistemology, Politics