The Role of Litter Quality Feedbacks in Terrestrial Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycling~!2009-12-07~!2010-01-22~!2010-03-16~!
Johannes M. H. Knops, David A. Wedin, Shahid Naeem
Abstract
Open-access reader
Johannes M. H. Knops, David A. Wedin, Shahid Naeem
Abstract
Open-access reader
Many studies in ecosystem ecology argue for strong control of litter quality over nitrogen (N) cycling.We developed a model for temperate grasslands to test the importance of litter quality in decomposition for N and phosphorus (P) cycling based on the following premises.First, terrestrial N and P cycling differ fundamentally because N is a structural component of the soil organic matter (SOM), whereas P is not.Secondly, SOM has a much lower C:N ratio than litter inputs.Thirdly, litter decomposition follows an exponential decay with 20% of the original litter mass turning into SOM.Fourth, litter N concentration shows an exponential increase during decomposition, whereas P does not change and is released proportionally to the litter mass.Based on these premises we constructed a model which shows that 0.75% N is a critical initial litter concentration at which concentration all N is immobilized and no N is released from the litter.Thus at 0.75% N of the litter all net N mineralization is through SOM decomposition and not through litter decomposition.Phosphorus, in contrast, is primarily released in the early stages of litter decomposition.Empirical tests of these model predictions support the applicability of the model to temperate grassland ecosystems.This model predicts that N mineralization from SOM is much more important than mineralization from litter and that plant litter quality differences alone cannot explain ecosystem N cycling patterns.Phosphorus, in contrast, does cycle largely through litter decomposition, and plant litter quality differences are the dominant factor in determining ecosystem P cycling feedbacks.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many studies in ecosystem ecology argue for strong control of litter quality over nitrogen (N) cycling.We developed a model for temperate grasslands to test the importance of litter quality in decomposition for N and phosphorus (P) cycling based on the following premises.First, terrestrial N and P cycling differ fundamentally because N is a structural component of the soil organic matter (SOM), whereas P is not.Secondly, SOM has a much lower C:N ratio than litter inputs.Thirdly, litter decomposition follows an exponential decay with 20% of the original litter mass turning into SOM.Fourth, litter N concentration shows an exponential increase during decomposition, whereas P does not change and is released proportionally to the litter mass.Based on these premises we constructed a model which shows that 0.75% N is a critical initial litter concentration at which concentration all N is immobilized and no N is released from the litter.Thus at 0.75% N of the litter all net N mineralization is through SOM decomposition and not through litter decomposition.Phosphorus, in contrast, is primarily released in the early stages of litter decomposition.Empirical tests of these model predictions support the applicability of the model to temperate grassland ecosystems.This model predicts that N mineralization from SOM is much more important than mineralization from litter and that plant litter quality differences alone cannot explain ecosystem N cycling patterns.Phosphorus, in contrast, does cycle largely through litter decomposition, and plant litter quality differences are the dominant factor in determining ecosystem P cycling feedbacks.
Key concepts: Cycling, Phosphorus, Litter, Nitrogen, Environmental science, Nitrogen cycle, Quality (philosophy), Ecology