2007Teaching Exceptional Children-PlusRequires access

Intensifying Reading Instruction for Students within a Three-Tier Model: Standard-Protocol and Problem Solving Approaches within a Response-to-Intervention (RTI) System.

Nancy E. Marchand‐Martella, Susan F. Ruby, Ronald C. Martella

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Response to Intervention (RTI) provides a challenge for schools to deliver appropriate and scientifically validated reading instruction to all students through a three-tier model. While many educators recognize the need for a strong core-reading program (Tier 1), interventions for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students remain more difficult to implement. We provide a clear example of how one empirically supported program was implemented within a three-tier model for K-3 students. Our example highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of a standard-protocol approach with problem solving. Effect sizes for K-2 students across the three tiers ranged from .50 to 3.96 on Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) measures; effect size improvements on the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) ranged from .72 to 3.37 for third-grade students.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Response to Intervention (RTI) provides a challenge for schools to deliver appropriate and scientifically validated reading instruction to all students through a three-tier model. While many educators recognize the need for a strong core-reading program (Tier 1), interventions for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students remain more difficult to implement. We provide a clear example of how one empirically supported program was implemented within a three-tier model for K-3 students. Our example highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of a standard-protocol approach with problem solving. Effect sizes for K-2 students across the three tiers ranged from .50 to 3.96 on Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) measures; effect size improvements on the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) ranged from .72 to 3.37 for third-grade students.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Response to Intervention (RTI) provides a challenge for schools to deliver appropriate and scientifically validated reading instruction to all students through a three-tier model. While many educators recognize the need for a strong core-reading program (Tier 1), interventions for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students remain more difficult to implement. We provide a clear example of how one empirically supported program was implemented within a three-tier model for K-3 students. Our example highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of a standard-protocol approach with problem solving. Effect sizes for K-2 students across the three tiers ranged from .50 to 3.96 on Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) measures; effect size improvements on the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) ranged from .72 to 3.37 for third-grade students.

Key concepts: Tier 2 network, Tier 1 network, Reading (process), Response to intervention, Protocol (science), Mathematics education, Computer science, Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intensifying Reading Instruction for Students within a Three-Tier Model: Standard-Protocol and Problem Solving Approaches within a Response-to-Intervention (RTI) System. — Research Paper | ScholarLens