2013Saudi Medical JournalRequires access

Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer

Kamil Mosa Fram, I. M. A. Sumrein

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Up until 20 years ago, laparotomy was the single method of surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. Wider acceptance for the laparoscopic approach has been gained by gynecologic surgeons as an alternative surgical method. Clinical application of laparoscopic surgery has grown rapidly, yet it remains to be proven if this technique has brought great benefits. The location of minimal-access surgery in gynecologic oncology has proven effective particularly with the growth of exchanged experience among surgeons. As operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology remains novel, the potentiality of the procedure is underscored. In this review, we survey the literature on this technique and critically evaluate the indications, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of this approach to hysterectomy. Due regard should be given certain patients with indications for an abdominal hysterectomy to the benefits that laparoscopic hysterectomy may offer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Up until 20 years ago, laparotomy was the single method of surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. Wider acceptance for the laparoscopic approach has been gained by gynecologic surgeons as an alternative surgical method. Clinical application of laparoscopic surgery has grown rapidly, yet it remains to be proven if this technique has brought great benefits. The location of minimal-access surgery in gynecologic oncology has proven effective particularly with the growth of exchanged experience among surgeons. As operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology remains novel, the potentiality of the procedure is underscored. In this review, we survey the literature on this technique and critically evaluate the indications, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of this approach to hysterectomy. Due regard should be given certain patients with indications for an abdominal hysterectomy to the benefits that laparoscopic hysterectomy may offer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Up until 20 years ago, laparotomy was the single method of surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. Wider acceptance for the laparoscopic approach has been gained by gynecologic surgeons as an alternative surgical method. Clinical application of laparoscopic surgery has grown rapidly, yet it remains to be proven if this technique has brought great benefits. The location of minimal-access surgery in gynecologic oncology has proven effective particularly with the growth of exchanged experience among surgeons. As operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology remains novel, the potentiality of the procedure is underscored. In this review, we survey the literature on this technique and critically evaluate the indications, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of this approach to hysterectomy. Due regard should be given certain patients with indications for an abdominal hysterectomy to the benefits that laparoscopic hysterectomy may offer.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gynecologic oncology, Endometrial cancer, Laparotomy, Hysterectomy, General surgery, Laparoscopy, Abdominal hysterectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens