2006The Lancet Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review

Karen R Steingart, Megan Henry, Vivienne Ng, Philip C. Hopewell, Andrew Ramsay, Jane Cunningham, R Urbanczik, Mark D. Perkins, Mohamed Abdel Aziz, Madhukar Pai

Open publisher page 801 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 801 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Fluorescence microscope, Microscopy, Optical microscope, Sputum, Tuberculosis, Fluorescence, Medicine, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review — Research Paper | ScholarLens