1994Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyOpen access

In vitro susceptibilities of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605 (SUN/SY 5555), a new oral penem, compared with those to penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir

S K Spangler, Michael R. Jacobs, Peter C. Appelbaum

Open full text 51 citations

Abstract

In vitro susceptibility of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605, a new oral penem, was compared with susceptibility to penicillin G, amoxicillin with and without clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir. WY-49605 yielded MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) of 0.03 and 0.06, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively, against penicillin-susceptible, intermediately resistant, and fully resistant strains, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 for both amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were identical and approximately 1 doubling dilution higher than those for WY-49605 and were < or = 0.06 and 0.125, 0.25 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cephalosporin MIC90s were all significantly higher than those of the latter three compounds for intermediately resistant and fully resistant strains.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In vitro susceptibility of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605, a new oral penem, was compared with susceptibility to penicillin G, amoxicillin with and without clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir. WY-49605 yielded MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) of 0.03 and 0.06, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively, against penicillin-susceptible, intermediately resistant, and fully resistant strains, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 for both amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were identical and approximately 1 doubling dilution higher than those for WY-49605 and were < or = 0.06 and 0.125, 0.25 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cephalosporin MIC90s were all significantly higher than those of the latter three compounds for intermediately resistant and fully resistant strains.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In vitro susceptibility of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605, a new oral penem, was compared with susceptibility to penicillin G, amoxicillin with and without clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir. WY-49605 yielded MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) of 0.03 and 0.06, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively, against penicillin-susceptible, intermediately resistant, and fully resistant strains, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 for both amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were identical and approximately 1 doubling dilution higher than those for WY-49605 and were < or = 0.06 and 0.125, 0.25 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cephalosporin MIC90s were all significantly higher than those of the latter three compounds for intermediately resistant and fully resistant strains.

Key concepts: Cefdinir, Cefpodoxime, Cefixime, Cefuroxime, Cefaclor, Penicillin, Amoxicillin, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In vitro susceptibilities of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605 (SUN/SY 5555), a new oral penem, compared with those to penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir — Research Paper | ScholarLens