2002•British Journal of Sports MedicineOpen access

Effect of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) closed cell foam on transmitted forces in mouthguard material

B. Westerman, P. M. Stringfellow, J. A. Eccleston, D. J. Harbrow

Open full text 38 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare transmitted forces through ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguard material and the same EVA material with gas inclusions in the form of a closed cell foam. METHOD: EVA mouthguard materials with and without foam gas inclusions and 4 mm thick were impacted with a constant force from an impact pendulum. Various porosity levels in the foam materials were produced by 1%, 5%, and 10% by weight foaming agent. The forces transmitted through the EVA after energy absorption by the test materials were measured with a force sensor and compared. RESULTS: Only minor non-significant differences in transmitted forces through the EVA with and without foam were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of gas in the form of a closed cell foam in 4 mm thick EVA mouthguard materials did not improve the impact performance of the EVA mouthguard material.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To compare transmitted forces through ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguard material and the same EVA material with gas inclusions in the form of a closed cell foam. METHOD: EVA mouthguard materials with and without foam gas inclusions and 4 mm thick were impacted with a constant force from an impact pendulum. Various porosity levels in the foam materials were produced by 1%, 5%, and 10% by weight foaming agent. The forces transmitted through the EVA after energy absorption by the test materials were measured with a force sensor and compared. RESULTS: Only minor non-significant differences in transmitted forces through the EVA with and without foam were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of gas in the form of a closed cell foam in 4 mm thick EVA mouthguard materials did not improve the impact performance of the EVA mouthguard material.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare transmitted forces through ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguard material and the same EVA material with gas inclusions in the form of a closed cell foam. METHOD: EVA mouthguard materials with and without foam gas inclusions and 4 mm thick were impacted with a constant force from an impact pendulum. Various porosity levels in the foam materials were produced by 1%, 5%, and 10% by weight foaming agent. The forces transmitted through the EVA after energy absorption by the test materials were measured with a force sensor and compared. RESULTS: Only minor non-significant differences in transmitted forces through the EVA with and without foam were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of gas in the form of a closed cell foam in 4 mm thick EVA mouthguard materials did not improve the impact performance of the EVA mouthguard material.

Key concepts: Mouthguard, Ethylene-vinyl acetate, Materials science, Composite material, Metal foam, Porosity, Copolymer, Polymer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) closed cell foam on transmitted forces in mouthguard material — Research Paper | ScholarLens