1984Water Resources ResearchRequires access

Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds

Patrick G. Sloan, Ian D. Moore

Open publisher page 297 citations

Abstract

Five mathematical models for predicting subsurface flow were compared to discharge measurements made by Hewlett and Hibbert (1963) on a uniform sloping soil trough at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. The models included one‐ and two‐dimensional finite element models based on the Richards equation, a kinematic wave model, and two simple storage‐discharge models based on the kinematic wave and Boussinesq assumptions. The simple models simulated the subsurface response and water table positions as well as the more complex models based on the Richards equation and were much more economical to use from the point of view of computational costs. Such models have features that would allow them to be incorporated into more complex watershed models, thus placing hydrologic prediction on a more physically correct and less empirical footing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Five mathematical models for predicting subsurface flow were compared to discharge measurements made by Hewlett and Hibbert (1963) on a uniform sloping soil trough at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. The models included one‐ and two‐dimensional finite element models based on the Richards equation, a kinematic wave model, and two simple storage‐discharge models based on the kinematic wave and Boussinesq assumptions. The simple models simulated the subsurface response and water table positions as well as the more complex models based on the Richards equation and were much more economical to use from the point of view of computational costs. Such models have features that would allow them to be incorporated into more complex watershed models, thus placing hydrologic prediction on a more physically correct and less empirical footing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 297 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Five mathematical models for predicting subsurface flow were compared to discharge measurements made by Hewlett and Hibbert (1963) on a uniform sloping soil trough at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. The models included one‐ and two‐dimensional finite element models based on the Richards equation, a kinematic wave model, and two simple storage‐discharge models based on the kinematic wave and Boussinesq assumptions. The simple models simulated the subsurface response and water table positions as well as the more complex models based on the Richards equation and were much more economical to use from the point of view of computational costs. Such models have features that would allow them to be incorporated into more complex watershed models, thus placing hydrologic prediction on a more physically correct and less empirical footing.

Key concepts: Kinematic wave, Richards equation, Watershed, Hydrology (agriculture), Water table, Geology, Hydrological modelling, Kinematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds — Research Paper | ScholarLens