1975•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Reliability: Policy Versus Implementation.

Tsuchida,George

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a better understanding and appreciation of the reliability management factors that influence a shipboard weapon system acquisition manager. The results of a Naval Material Command Reliability Improvements Study Group are summarized. This summary and the current Navy reliability policies were then used as a basis for interviewing seven acquisition managers, covering ten shipboard weapon system programs of the Naval Sea systems Command. Results of the interviews indicated two significant areas: (1) Inadequate reliability requirements in the Operational Requirement, and (2) Management judgment in tailoring the reliability requirements. This report should enable better management planning and implementation of reliability program requirements which must be integrated and balanced with other acquisition requirements during the early phases of a weapon system's life cycle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to provide a better understanding and appreciation of the reliability management factors that influence a shipboard weapon system acquisition manager. The results of a Naval Material Command Reliability Improvements Study Group are summarized. This summary and the current Navy reliability policies were then used as a basis for interviewing seven acquisition managers, covering ten shipboard weapon system programs of the Naval Sea systems Command. Results of the interviews indicated two significant areas: (1) Inadequate reliability requirements in the Operational Requirement, and (2) Management judgment in tailoring the reliability requirements. This report should enable better management planning and implementation of reliability program requirements which must be integrated and balanced with other acquisition requirements during the early phases of a weapon system's life cycle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide a better understanding and appreciation of the reliability management factors that influence a shipboard weapon system acquisition manager. The results of a Naval Material Command Reliability Improvements Study Group are summarized. This summary and the current Navy reliability policies were then used as a basis for interviewing seven acquisition managers, covering ten shipboard weapon system programs of the Naval Sea systems Command. Results of the interviews indicated two significant areas: (1) Inadequate reliability requirements in the Operational Requirement, and (2) Management judgment in tailoring the reliability requirements. This report should enable better management planning and implementation of reliability program requirements which must be integrated and balanced with other acquisition requirements during the early phases of a weapon system's life cycle.

Key concepts: Reliability (semiconductor), Weapon system, Navy, Reliability engineering, Interview, Engineering, Computer science, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reliability: Policy Versus Implementation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens