2003•International Journal for Numerical Methods in FluidsRequires access

Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters

Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Open publisher page 455 citations

Abstract

Abstract The interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques we developed in recent years for computation of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces rely on stabilized formulations such as the streamline‐upwind/Petrov–Galerkin (SUPG) and pressure‐stabilizing/Petrov–Galerkin (PSPG) methods. The interface‐tracking techniques are based on the deforming‐spatial‐domain/stabilized space–time formulation, where the mesh moves to track the interface. The interface‐capturing techniques, typically used with non‐moving meshes, are based on a stabilized semi‐discrete formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations, combined with a stabilized formulation of the advection equation governing the time‐evolution of an interface function marking the interface location. We provide an overview of the interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques, and highlight how we determine the stabilization parameters used in the stabilized formulations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques we developed in recent years for computation of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces rely on stabilized formulations such as the streamline‐upwind/Petrov–Galerkin (SUPG) and pressure‐stabilizing/Petrov–Galerkin (PSPG) methods. The interface‐tracking techniques are based on the deforming‐spatial‐domain/stabilized space–time formulation, where the mesh moves to track the interface. The interface‐capturing techniques, typically used with non‐moving meshes, are based on a stabilized semi‐discrete formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations, combined with a stabilized formulation of the advection equation governing the time‐evolution of an interface function marking the interface location. We provide an overview of the interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques, and highlight how we determine the stabilization parameters used in the stabilized formulations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 455 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques we developed in recent years for computation of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces rely on stabilized formulations such as the streamline‐upwind/Petrov–Galerkin (SUPG) and pressure‐stabilizing/Petrov–Galerkin (PSPG) methods. The interface‐tracking techniques are based on the deforming‐spatial‐domain/stabilized space–time formulation, where the mesh moves to track the interface. The interface‐capturing techniques, typically used with non‐moving meshes, are based on a stabilized semi‐discrete formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations, combined with a stabilized formulation of the advection equation governing the time‐evolution of an interface function marking the interface location. We provide an overview of the interface‐tracking and interface‐capturing techniques, and highlight how we determine the stabilization parameters used in the stabilized formulations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Polygon mesh, Interface (matter), Computation, Petrov–Galerkin method, Tracking (education), Computer science, Volume of fluid method, Advection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters — Research Paper | ScholarLens