2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Developing Strategic Leaders While Maintaining the Warfighting Edge

Jessie O. Farrington

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The Army must enhance leader development in order to maintain the relevance of its leaders and senior leaders for the contemporary operating environment (COE) of the 21st Century. The complex contemporary political stage and operations in support of the Global War on Terrorism have demanded a different kind of Army strategic leader. These officers must be sound tactical and operational leaders, be multi-disciplined, and possess senior management, cultural, and diplomatic skills not typically required of officers in the past. Army strategic leader development is not just important to our Army, its critical to our national defense. The development of a strategic leader takes years, possibly a career to properly develop. The Army core competency is conducting land warfare, and most educational and assignment opportunities focus on building expertise in this core competency. Army culture prefers leaders with significant tactical and operational experience over leaders that have other than tactical and operational experience. When you consider the facts, it is easy to understand why the leader developmental model centers on the tactical and operational Army. The principle question of our time is - is the current leader development model of education, training and assignment adequate enough to build future strategic leaders?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Army must enhance leader development in order to maintain the relevance of its leaders and senior leaders for the contemporary operating environment (COE) of the 21st Century. The complex contemporary political stage and operations in support of the Global War on Terrorism have demanded a different kind of Army strategic leader. These officers must be sound tactical and operational leaders, be multi-disciplined, and possess senior management, cultural, and diplomatic skills not typically required of officers in the past. Army strategic leader development is not just important to our Army, its critical to our national defense. The development of a strategic leader takes years, possibly a career to properly develop. The Army core competency is conducting land warfare, and most educational and assignment opportunities focus on building expertise in this core competency. Army culture prefers leaders with significant tactical and operational experience over leaders that have other than tactical and operational experience. When you consider the facts, it is easy to understand why the leader developmental model centers on the tactical and operational Army. The principle question of our time is - is the current leader development model of education, training and assignment adequate enough to build future strategic leaders?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Army must enhance leader development in order to maintain the relevance of its leaders and senior leaders for the contemporary operating environment (COE) of the 21st Century. The complex contemporary political stage and operations in support of the Global War on Terrorism have demanded a different kind of Army strategic leader. These officers must be sound tactical and operational leaders, be multi-disciplined, and possess senior management, cultural, and diplomatic skills not typically required of officers in the past. Army strategic leader development is not just important to our Army, its critical to our national defense. The development of a strategic leader takes years, possibly a career to properly develop. The Army core competency is conducting land warfare, and most educational and assignment opportunities focus on building expertise in this core competency. Army culture prefers leaders with significant tactical and operational experience over leaders that have other than tactical and operational experience. When you consider the facts, it is easy to understand why the leader developmental model centers on the tactical and operational Army. The principle question of our time is - is the current leader development model of education, training and assignment adequate enough to build future strategic leaders?

Key concepts: Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution, Process management, Business, Computer science, Operations management, Telecommunications, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Developing Strategic Leaders While Maintaining the Warfighting Edge — Research Paper | ScholarLens