2009American Journal of RoentgenologyRequires access

Distal Attachment of the Brachialis Muscle: Anatomic and MRI Study in Cadavers

Hatice Tuba Sanal, Lina Chen, Pedro Negrão, Parviz Haghighi, Debra J. Trudell, DONALD L. RESNICK

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and anatomic correlation in cadavers to delineate the anatomic features of the distal attachment of the brachialis muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on 13 cadaveric elbows. The MRI findings were compared with those in anatomic sections and histologic preparations. The brachialis muscle of one cadaver was dissected. RESULTS: The dissected brachialis muscle had two heads, superficial and deep. The attachment of the superficial head to the ulnar tuberosity was farther distal than that of the deep head. The attachments of all aspects of the muscle included a tendinous layer rather than purely muscular structures. Histologic analysis showed no direct communication between the brachialis and biceps brachii tendons or between the brachialis tendon and joint capsule. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the anatomic features of the distal brachialis muscle and tendon is essential for accurate assessment of these structures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and anatomic correlation in cadavers to delineate the anatomic features of the distal attachment of the brachialis muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on 13 cadaveric elbows. The MRI findings were compared with those in anatomic sections and histologic preparations. The brachialis muscle of one cadaver was dissected. RESULTS: The dissected brachialis muscle had two heads, superficial and deep. The attachment of the superficial head to the ulnar tuberosity was farther distal than that of the deep head. The attachments of all aspects of the muscle included a tendinous layer rather than purely muscular structures. Histologic analysis showed no direct communication between the brachialis and biceps brachii tendons or between the brachialis tendon and joint capsule. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the anatomic features of the distal brachialis muscle and tendon is essential for accurate assessment of these structures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use MRI and anatomic correlation in cadavers to delineate the anatomic features of the distal attachment of the brachialis muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on 13 cadaveric elbows. The MRI findings were compared with those in anatomic sections and histologic preparations. The brachialis muscle of one cadaver was dissected. RESULTS: The dissected brachialis muscle had two heads, superficial and deep. The attachment of the superficial head to the ulnar tuberosity was farther distal than that of the deep head. The attachments of all aspects of the muscle included a tendinous layer rather than purely muscular structures. Histologic analysis showed no direct communication between the brachialis and biceps brachii tendons or between the brachialis tendon and joint capsule. CONCLUSION: Familiarity with the anatomic features of the distal brachialis muscle and tendon is essential for accurate assessment of these structures.

Key concepts: Brachialis, Medicine, Anatomy, Cadaver, Cadaveric spasm, Biceps, Tendon

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distal Attachment of the Brachialis Muscle: Anatomic and MRI Study in Cadavers — Research Paper | ScholarLens