1980Unpublished venueRequires access

LAND USE PLANNING FOR TRANSPORT ENERGY CONSERVATION IN AUSTRALIAN CITIES

Peter W. G. Newman, Jeffrey R Kenworthy

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

This paper was presented to Jubilee Anzaas Conference Science for a Substainable Society Section 4: Architecture & Planning Section Sustainable Urban Form, Adelaide, May 1980. The transport energy characteristics of Australian cities have been examined by obtaining detailed data on public and private transport. The results show: (1) the dominance of the private automobile and hence of gasoline as the primary transport fuel; (2) electric trains and trams are clearly the most efficient public transport mode and where they form the backbone of a public transport service, the patronage and energy efficiency are superior to a more bus- orientated service; (3) Perth and Adelaide on a per capita basis use more cars and hence more energy than Melbourne and Brisbane with Sydney having some 20 per cent lower energy per capita. These transport patterns were then found to correlate significantly with certain land use parameters. All the cities except Brisbane have transport patterns related to the density and degree of centralisation in land use. Brisbane's lower car use as well as the other cities' patterns appear to be related to the level of traffic restraint measured in terms of per capita road availability, traffic congestion, and CBD parking availability. Energy conservation can be pursued through increasing density and centralisation as medium term aims with traffic restraint or planned congestion as an immediate policy to introduce along with an upgrading of public transport (A). (TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper was presented to Jubilee Anzaas Conference Science for a Substainable Society Section 4: Architecture & Planning Section Sustainable Urban Form, Adelaide, May 1980. The transport energy characteristics of Australian cities have been examined by obtaining detailed data on public and private transport. The results show: (1) the dominance of the private automobile and hence of gasoline as the primary transport fuel; (2) electric trains and trams are clearly the most efficient public transport mode and where they form the backbone of a public transport service, the patronage and energy efficiency are superior to a more bus- orientated service; (3) Perth and Adelaide on a per capita basis use more cars and hence more energy than Melbourne and Brisbane with Sydney having some 20 per cent lower energy per capita. These transport patterns were then found to correlate significantly with certain land use parameters. All the cities except Brisbane have transport patterns related to the density and degree of centralisation in land use. Brisbane's lower car use as well as the other cities' patterns appear to be related to the level of traffic restraint measured in terms of per capita road availability, traffic congestion, and CBD parking availability. Energy conservation can be pursued through increasing density and centralisation as medium term aims with traffic restraint or planned congestion as an immediate policy to introduce along with an upgrading of public transport (A). (TRRL)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper was presented to Jubilee Anzaas Conference Science for a Substainable Society Section 4: Architecture & Planning Section Sustainable Urban Form, Adelaide, May 1980. The transport energy characteristics of Australian cities have been examined by obtaining detailed data on public and private transport. The results show: (1) the dominance of the private automobile and hence of gasoline as the primary transport fuel; (2) electric trains and trams are clearly the most efficient public transport mode and where they form the backbone of a public transport service, the patronage and energy efficiency are superior to a more bus- orientated service; (3) Perth and Adelaide on a per capita basis use more cars and hence more energy than Melbourne and Brisbane with Sydney having some 20 per cent lower energy per capita. These transport patterns were then found to correlate significantly with certain land use parameters. All the cities except Brisbane have transport patterns related to the density and degree of centralisation in land use. Brisbane's lower car use as well as the other cities' patterns appear to be related to the level of traffic restraint measured in terms of per capita road availability, traffic congestion, and CBD parking availability. Energy conservation can be pursued through increasing density and centralisation as medium term aims with traffic restraint or planned congestion as an immediate policy to introduce along with an upgrading of public transport (A). (TRRL)

Key concepts: Public transport, Per capita, Centralisation, Transport engineering, Traffic congestion, Private transport, Land use, Sustainable transport

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LAND USE PLANNING FOR TRANSPORT ENERGY CONSERVATION IN AUSTRALIAN CITIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens