1991Oral Microbiology and ImmunologyRequires access

Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of periapical abscess

Itzhak Brook, Edith H. Frazier, Marlin E. Gher

Open publisher page 184 citations

Abstract

Aspirates of pus from periapical abscesses in 39 patients were studied for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Bacterial growth was present in 32 specimens. A total of 78 bacterial isolates (55 anaerobic and 23 aerobic and facultative) were recovered, accounting for 2.4 isolates per specimen (1.7 anaerobic and 0.7 aerobic and facultatives). Anaerobic bacteria only were present in 16 (50%) patients, aerobic and facultatives in 2 (6%), and mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora in 14 (44%). The predominant isolates were Bacteroides spp. (23 isolates, including 13 Bacteroides melaninogenicus group), Streptococcus spp. (20), anaerobic cocci (18), and Fusobacterium spp. (9). Beta-lactamase-producing organisms were recovered from 7 of the 21 (33%) specimens that were tested. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature and importance of anaerobic bacteria in periapical abscess.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aspirates of pus from periapical abscesses in 39 patients were studied for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Bacterial growth was present in 32 specimens. A total of 78 bacterial isolates (55 anaerobic and 23 aerobic and facultative) were recovered, accounting for 2.4 isolates per specimen (1.7 anaerobic and 0.7 aerobic and facultatives). Anaerobic bacteria only were present in 16 (50%) patients, aerobic and facultatives in 2 (6%), and mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora in 14 (44%). The predominant isolates were Bacteroides spp. (23 isolates, including 13 Bacteroides melaninogenicus group), Streptococcus spp. (20), anaerobic cocci (18), and Fusobacterium spp. (9). Beta-lactamase-producing organisms were recovered from 7 of the 21 (33%) specimens that were tested. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature and importance of anaerobic bacteria in periapical abscess.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 184 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aspirates of pus from periapical abscesses in 39 patients were studied for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Bacterial growth was present in 32 specimens. A total of 78 bacterial isolates (55 anaerobic and 23 aerobic and facultative) were recovered, accounting for 2.4 isolates per specimen (1.7 anaerobic and 0.7 aerobic and facultatives). Anaerobic bacteria only were present in 16 (50%) patients, aerobic and facultatives in 2 (6%), and mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora in 14 (44%). The predominant isolates were Bacteroides spp. (23 isolates, including 13 Bacteroides melaninogenicus group), Streptococcus spp. (20), anaerobic cocci (18), and Fusobacterium spp. (9). Beta-lactamase-producing organisms were recovered from 7 of the 21 (33%) specimens that were tested. This study highlights the polymicrobial nature and importance of anaerobic bacteria in periapical abscess.

Key concepts: Anaerobic exercise, Microbiology, Anaerobic bacteria, Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, Biology, Bacteria, Aerobic bacteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of periapical abscess — Research Paper | ScholarLens