Resonance and field/inductive substituent effects on the gas‐phase acidities of para‐substituted phenols: a direct approach employing density functional theory
Josiah B. Barbour, Joel M. Karty
Abstract
Open-access reader
Josiah B. Barbour, Joel M. Karty
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract Relative gas‐phase acidities of para‐substituted phenols (1, Sub—C6H4—OH) and their ω‐substituted para‐alkylphenol analogs [2, Sub—(CH2)n—C6H4—OH] were calculated at the B3LYP/6–31+G* and AM1 levels of theory. The acidity of a substituted molecule of 2 is compared with that of the unsubstituted molecule of 2 to determine the field/inductive effect of the substituent on the acidity of 2. This field/inductive effect was extrapolated to n = 0, yielding the field/inductive effect of the substituent on the acidity of 1. The derived field/inductive effect in 1 was subtracted from the difference in acidity between 1 and phenol in order to determine the resonance effect of the substituent on the acidity of 1. Our results are compared with the field/inductive and resonance substituent parameters empirically derived from previous experimental solution studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Relative gas‐phase acidities of para‐substituted phenols (1, Sub—C6H4—OH) and their ω‐substituted para‐alkylphenol analogs [2, Sub—(CH2)n—C6H4—OH] were calculated at the B3LYP/6–31+G* and AM1 levels of theory. The acidity of a substituted molecule of 2 is compared with that of the unsubstituted molecule of 2 to determine the field/inductive effect of the substituent on the acidity of 2. This field/inductive effect was extrapolated to n = 0, yielding the field/inductive effect of the substituent on the acidity of 1. The derived field/inductive effect in 1 was subtracted from the difference in acidity between 1 and phenol in order to determine the resonance effect of the substituent on the acidity of 1. Our results are compared with the field/inductive and resonance substituent parameters empirically derived from previous experimental solution studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Key concepts: Substituent, Chemistry, Inductive effect, Phenols, Resonance (particle physics), Phenol, Density functional theory, Computational chemistry