A note on downward continuation of gravity
César A. Trejo
Abstract
César A. Trejo
Abstract
Abstract Comparing calculated and exact values in an ideal example, it is shown that Peters' proposed method of downward continuation of gravity is far less suitable than a combination of Peters' procedure for upward continuation and a finite differences method for downward continuation. It is shown also how Peters' method can be substantially improved by considering only the closest values in the downward step of a continuation process.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Comparing calculated and exact values in an ideal example, it is shown that Peters' proposed method of downward continuation of gravity is far less suitable than a combination of Peters' procedure for upward continuation and a finite differences method for downward continuation. It is shown also how Peters' method can be substantially improved by considering only the closest values in the downward step of a continuation process.
Key concepts: Continuation, Analytic continuation, Ideal (ethics), Mathematics, Process (computing), Calculus (dental), Applied mathematics, Mathematical analysis