2004UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)Requires access

Modelling count data with extra observed zeros

Mahesh Bulsara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the commonly used Poisson regression model fits count data when there are excess zero counts present, and to investigate the use of alternative models. Research design and methods: A total of 1229 children with type 1 diabetes (mean age 11.7 years and sd 4.1) were studied. The gender distribution was even with 605 (49.2%) males. Prospective assessment of severe hypoglycaemia (an event leading to loss of consciousness or seizure or resulting in a hospital admission) was made over the nine year period, 1992-2001. Patients were seen with their parents every three months. Data were analysed using the Poisson regression, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models. The over dispersion, likelihood ratio statistics and goodness of fit statistics were calculated. Results: A comparison of all four models was made. The Poisson regression model did not fit the data well. The negative binomial is a popular alternative and fits better. The ZIP models fitted the data better than Poisson. Conclusions: The use of Poisson regression models may lead to biased parameter estimates. We recommend the use of either the negative binomial or zero-inflated models to examine risk factors associated with disease outcome. Statistical software is available to fit these models. (author abstract)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To determine if the commonly used Poisson regression model fits count data when there are excess zero counts present, and to investigate the use of alternative models. Research design and methods: A total of 1229 children with type 1 diabetes (mean age 11.7 years and sd 4.1) were studied. The gender distribution was even with 605 (49.2%) males. Prospective assessment of severe hypoglycaemia (an event leading to loss of consciousness or seizure or resulting in a hospital admission) was made over the nine year period, 1992-2001. Patients were seen with their parents every three months. Data were analysed using the Poisson regression, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models. The over dispersion, likelihood ratio statistics and goodness of fit statistics were calculated. Results: A comparison of all four models was made. The Poisson regression model did not fit the data well. The negative binomial is a popular alternative and fits better. The ZIP models fitted the data better than Poisson. Conclusions: The use of Poisson regression models may lead to biased parameter estimates. We recommend the use of either the negative binomial or zero-inflated models to examine risk factors associated with disease outcome. Statistical software is available to fit these models. (author abstract)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To determine if the commonly used Poisson regression model fits count data when there are excess zero counts present, and to investigate the use of alternative models. Research design and methods: A total of 1229 children with type 1 diabetes (mean age 11.7 years and sd 4.1) were studied. The gender distribution was even with 605 (49.2%) males. Prospective assessment of severe hypoglycaemia (an event leading to loss of consciousness or seizure or resulting in a hospital admission) was made over the nine year period, 1992-2001. Patients were seen with their parents every three months. Data were analysed using the Poisson regression, negative binomial, zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models. The over dispersion, likelihood ratio statistics and goodness of fit statistics were calculated. Results: A comparison of all four models was made. The Poisson regression model did not fit the data well. The negative binomial is a popular alternative and fits better. The ZIP models fitted the data better than Poisson. Conclusions: The use of Poisson regression models may lead to biased parameter estimates. We recommend the use of either the negative binomial or zero-inflated models to examine risk factors associated with disease outcome. Statistical software is available to fit these models. (author abstract)

Key concepts: Negative binomial distribution, Count data, Poisson regression, Statistics, Poisson distribution, Overdispersion, Quasi-likelihood, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modelling count data with extra observed zeros — Research Paper | ScholarLens