Fixed versus Flexible Exchange Rates: Evidence from Developing Countries
Mathias Hoffmann
Abstract
Mathias Hoffmann
Abstract
This paper investigates the hypothesis that in a small open economy flexible exchange rates act as a ‘shock absorber’ and mitigate the effects of external shocks more effectively than fixed exchange rate regimes. Using a sample of 42 developing countries, the paper assesses whether the responses of real GDP, the trade balance and the real exchange rate to world output and world real interest rate shocks differ across exchange rate regimes. The paper shows that there are significant differences in the variability of macroeconomic aggregates under fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes.
OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper investigates the hypothesis that in a small open economy flexible exchange rates act as a ‘shock absorber’ and mitigate the effects of external shocks more effectively than fixed exchange rate regimes. Using a sample of 42 developing countries, the paper assesses whether the responses of real GDP, the trade balance and the real exchange rate to world output and world real interest rate shocks differ across exchange rate regimes. The paper shows that there are significant differences in the variability of macroeconomic aggregates under fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes.
Key concepts: Exchange rate, Economics, Monetary economics, Fixed exchange rates, Shock (circulatory), Developing country, Exchange-rate regime, Sample (material)