1979˜The œFrench reviewRequires access

The Phonetic Status of the French A-Vowels.

Louise Kikuchi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO AN ARTICLE IN THIS REVIEW discussed the ambiguous status of the French A-phonemes. Pierre Delattre in La Question des deux 'a' en frangais' in effect described the weak linguistic function of the vowel traditionally called a posterieur. Now there is new information on the current phonetic state of this vowel which differs somewhat from the expectations drawn from past descriptions. In addition to the practical interest in studying these sounds for pedagogical reasons, the A-vowels in themselves are interesting phenomena. Perhaps no two other phonemes in the traditional French inventory are so subtly differentiated acoustically, articulatorily and perceptually. In terms of absolute values, used to measure and compare them, the differences are small. Yet Parisians are able to identify these sounds. This ability to detect subtle differences points to a perceptual language model which is based on the principle of comparison; rather than recognizing speech bits according to absolute values, we must identify these segments relatively, one point in relation to another. These Parisian A-vowels are also interesting from a sociological perspective. The shade of difference which distinguishes the two vowels and the infrequent occurrence of posterior A render this latter vowel prestigious. Its rarity and subtlety are two probable factors which identify the articulator of this A-vowel as belonging to the Parisian upper-middle class.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO AN ARTICLE IN THIS REVIEW discussed the ambiguous status of the French A-phonemes. Pierre Delattre in La Question des deux 'a' en frangais' in effect described the weak linguistic function of the vowel traditionally called a posterieur. Now there is new information on the current phonetic state of this vowel which differs somewhat from the expectations drawn from past descriptions. In addition to the practical interest in studying these sounds for pedagogical reasons, the A-vowels in themselves are interesting phenomena. Perhaps no two other phonemes in the traditional French inventory are so subtly differentiated acoustically, articulatorily and perceptually. In terms of absolute values, used to measure and compare them, the differences are small. Yet Parisians are able to identify these sounds. This ability to detect subtle differences points to a perceptual language model which is based on the principle of comparison; rather than recognizing speech bits according to absolute values, we must identify these segments relatively, one point in relation to another. These Parisian A-vowels are also interesting from a sociological perspective. The shade of difference which distinguishes the two vowels and the infrequent occurrence of posterior A render this latter vowel prestigious. Its rarity and subtlety are two probable factors which identify the articulator of this A-vowel as belonging to the Parisian upper-middle class.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO AN ARTICLE IN THIS REVIEW discussed the ambiguous status of the French A-phonemes. Pierre Delattre in La Question des deux 'a' en frangais' in effect described the weak linguistic function of the vowel traditionally called a posterieur. Now there is new information on the current phonetic state of this vowel which differs somewhat from the expectations drawn from past descriptions. In addition to the practical interest in studying these sounds for pedagogical reasons, the A-vowels in themselves are interesting phenomena. Perhaps no two other phonemes in the traditional French inventory are so subtly differentiated acoustically, articulatorily and perceptually. In terms of absolute values, used to measure and compare them, the differences are small. Yet Parisians are able to identify these sounds. This ability to detect subtle differences points to a perceptual language model which is based on the principle of comparison; rather than recognizing speech bits according to absolute values, we must identify these segments relatively, one point in relation to another. These Parisian A-vowels are also interesting from a sociological perspective. The shade of difference which distinguishes the two vowels and the infrequent occurrence of posterior A render this latter vowel prestigious. Its rarity and subtlety are two probable factors which identify the articulator of this A-vowel as belonging to the Parisian upper-middle class.

Key concepts: Vowel, Linguistics, Sound change, Perspective (graphical), Point (geometry), Perception, Psychology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Phonetic Status of the French A-Vowels. — Research Paper | ScholarLens