Doing without deliberation: Automatism, automaticity, and moral accountability
Neil Levy, Tim Bayne
Abstract
Open-access reader
Neil Levy, Tim Bayne
Abstract
Open-access reader
Actions performed in a state of automatism are not subject to moral evaluation, while automatic actions often are. Is the asymmetry between automatistic and automatic actions justified? In order to answer this question we need a model of moral accountability that does justice to our intuitions about a range of modes of agency, both pathological and non-pathological. Our aim in this paper is to lay the groundwork for the development of such a model.In all of us, even in good men, there is a lawlesswild-beast nature, which peers out in sleep.Plato, The Republic
OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Actions performed in a state of automatism are not subject to moral evaluation, while automatic actions often are. Is the asymmetry between automatistic and automatic actions justified? In order to answer this question we need a model of moral accountability that does justice to our intuitions about a range of modes of agency, both pathological and non-pathological. Our aim in this paper is to lay the groundwork for the development of such a model.In all of us, even in good men, there is a lawlesswild-beast nature, which peers out in sleep.Plato, The Republic
Key concepts: Automatism (medicine), Automaticity, Deliberation, Psychology, Accountability, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Political science