2013Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationOpen access

Predicting non-isometric fatigue induced by electrical stimulation pulse trains as a function of pulse duration

M. Susan Marion, Anthony S. Wexler, Maury L. Hull

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our previous model of the non-isometric muscle fatigue that occurs during repetitive functional electrical stimulation included models of force, motion, and fatigue and accounted for applied load but not stimulation pulse duration. Our objectives were to: 1) further develop, 2) validate, and 3) present outcome measures for a non-isometric fatigue model that can predict the effect of a range of pulse durations on muscle fatigue. METHODS: A computer-controlled stimulator sent electrical pulses to electrodes on the thighs of 25 able-bodied human subjects. Isometric and non-isometric non-fatiguing and fatiguing knee torques and/or angles were measured. Pulse duration (170-600 μs) was the independent variable. Measurements were divided into parameter identification and model validation subsets. RESULTS: The fatigue model was simplified by removing two of three non-isometric parameters. The third remained a function of other model parameters. Between 66% and 77% of the variability in the angle measurements was explained by the new model. CONCLUSION: Muscle fatigue in response to different stimulation pulse durations can be predicted during non-isometric repetitive contractions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Our previous model of the non-isometric muscle fatigue that occurs during repetitive functional electrical stimulation included models of force, motion, and fatigue and accounted for applied load but not stimulation pulse duration. Our objectives were to: 1) further develop, 2) validate, and 3) present outcome measures for a non-isometric fatigue model that can predict the effect of a range of pulse durations on muscle fatigue. METHODS: A computer-controlled stimulator sent electrical pulses to electrodes on the thighs of 25 able-bodied human subjects. Isometric and non-isometric non-fatiguing and fatiguing knee torques and/or angles were measured. Pulse duration (170-600 μs) was the independent variable. Measurements were divided into parameter identification and model validation subsets. RESULTS: The fatigue model was simplified by removing two of three non-isometric parameters. The third remained a function of other model parameters. Between 66% and 77% of the variability in the angle measurements was explained by the new model. CONCLUSION: Muscle fatigue in response to different stimulation pulse durations can be predicted during non-isometric repetitive contractions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Our previous model of the non-isometric muscle fatigue that occurs during repetitive functional electrical stimulation included models of force, motion, and fatigue and accounted for applied load but not stimulation pulse duration. Our objectives were to: 1) further develop, 2) validate, and 3) present outcome measures for a non-isometric fatigue model that can predict the effect of a range of pulse durations on muscle fatigue. METHODS: A computer-controlled stimulator sent electrical pulses to electrodes on the thighs of 25 able-bodied human subjects. Isometric and non-isometric non-fatiguing and fatiguing knee torques and/or angles were measured. Pulse duration (170-600 μs) was the independent variable. Measurements were divided into parameter identification and model validation subsets. RESULTS: The fatigue model was simplified by removing two of three non-isometric parameters. The third remained a function of other model parameters. Between 66% and 77% of the variability in the angle measurements was explained by the new model. CONCLUSION: Muscle fatigue in response to different stimulation pulse durations can be predicted during non-isometric repetitive contractions.

Key concepts: Isometric exercise, Muscle fatigue, Functional electrical stimulation, Pulse (music), Pulse duration, Stimulation, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Duration (music)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting non-isometric fatigue induced by electrical stimulation pulse trains as a function of pulse duration — Research Paper | ScholarLens