1987•PubMedOpen access

Methods to validate nursing diagnoses.

Richard Jerome Fehring

Open full text 594 citations

Abstract

Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 594 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.

Key concepts: Medical diagnosis, Nursing diagnosis, Medicine, Nursing, MEDLINE, Nursing Outcomes Classification, Nursing research, Team nursing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. — Research Paper | ScholarLens