Methods to validate nursing diagnoses.
Richard Jerome Fehring
Abstract
Open-access reader
Richard Jerome Fehring
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.
OpenAlex reports 594 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Ever since nurses began officially to label the phenomena that they diagnose and treat, there has a need to validate the existence of those phenomena. Nurses who use the official North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) list of nursing diagnoses often find the diagnostic labels and their defining characteristics are not relevant and are not what they identify in clinical practice. If this problem continues, nurses will not have confidence in the official diagnoses and will view them, at best, as an academic exercise imposed by nursing leaders divorced from the real world of nursing. A source of the problem is that many of the nursing diagnoses on the current NANDA-approved list were included with little empirical evidence. To be on the improved list means that the diagnosis has been accepted for further testing, validation, and refinement.
Key concepts: Medical diagnosis, Nursing diagnosis, Medicine, Nursing, MEDLINE, Nursing Outcomes Classification, Nursing research, Team nursing