1984Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyOpen access

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam and their microbiological correlates in volunteers

George L. Drusano, Harold C. Standiford, Brian J. Fitzpatrick, James L. Leslie, P Tangtatsawasdi, Patricia Ryan, Beverly A. Tatem, Marcia R. Moody, Stephen C. Schimpff

Open full text 34 citations

Abstract

We compared ceftazidime with moxalactam, a commonly utilized, currently available drug. The microbiological activities of ceftazidime and moxalactam were studied. In addition, single-dose pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity 1 and 6 h after a 2.0-g, 30-min infusion of each drug were determined in a crossover study in human volunteers. In vitro, both drugs had MICs for 90% of the isolates of less than 1.0 microgram/ml against the common members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and of 8.0 micrograms/ml against Staphylococcus aureus. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftazidime was more active than moxalactam, the respective MICs for 90% of the isolates being 8 and 128 micrograms/ml. Mean half-lives were 1.75 (+/- 0.21) h for ceftazidime and 2.5 (+/- 0.38) h for moxalactam. The serum bactericidal titers for both compounds against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were high. Titers against S. aureus 6 h after infusion were negative. The mean (geometric) serum bactericidal titer of ceftazidime against 31 strains of P. aeruginosa (1:44) was higher than that of moxalactam (1:3.4).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared ceftazidime with moxalactam, a commonly utilized, currently available drug. The microbiological activities of ceftazidime and moxalactam were studied. In addition, single-dose pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity 1 and 6 h after a 2.0-g, 30-min infusion of each drug were determined in a crossover study in human volunteers. In vitro, both drugs had MICs for 90% of the isolates of less than 1.0 microgram/ml against the common members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and of 8.0 micrograms/ml against Staphylococcus aureus. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftazidime was more active than moxalactam, the respective MICs for 90% of the isolates being 8 and 128 micrograms/ml. Mean half-lives were 1.75 (+/- 0.21) h for ceftazidime and 2.5 (+/- 0.38) h for moxalactam. The serum bactericidal titers for both compounds against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were high. Titers against S. aureus 6 h after infusion were negative. The mean (geometric) serum bactericidal titer of ceftazidime against 31 strains of P. aeruginosa (1:44) was higher than that of moxalactam (1:3.4).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared ceftazidime with moxalactam, a commonly utilized, currently available drug. The microbiological activities of ceftazidime and moxalactam were studied. In addition, single-dose pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activity 1 and 6 h after a 2.0-g, 30-min infusion of each drug were determined in a crossover study in human volunteers. In vitro, both drugs had MICs for 90% of the isolates of less than 1.0 microgram/ml against the common members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and of 8.0 micrograms/ml against Staphylococcus aureus. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftazidime was more active than moxalactam, the respective MICs for 90% of the isolates being 8 and 128 micrograms/ml. Mean half-lives were 1.75 (+/- 0.21) h for ceftazidime and 2.5 (+/- 0.38) h for moxalactam. The serum bactericidal titers for both compounds against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were high. Titers against S. aureus 6 h after infusion were negative. The mean (geometric) serum bactericidal titer of ceftazidime against 31 strains of P. aeruginosa (1:44) was higher than that of moxalactam (1:3.4).

Key concepts: Moxalactam, Ceftazidime, Microbiology, Latamoxef, Pharmacokinetics, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam and their microbiological correlates in volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens