2013•Journal of Computer Assisted LearningRequires access

Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning

Marc Clarà, Elena Barberà

Open publisher page 81 citations

Abstract

Abstract Connectivism, which has been argued to be a new learning theory, has emerged in the field of online learning during the last decade. On the W orld W ide W eb at least, connectivism promises to establish learning spaces similar to those that I van I llich imagined in ‘ D eschooling Society ’, through so‐called massive online open courses ( MOOC s). In this paper, we critically examine the theoretical postulates of connectivism and identify three important psychological and epistemological problems, namely the lack of a solution to the learning paradox, the underconceptualization of interaction and the inability to explain concept development. Some of the theoretical deficiencies in question may explain certain learning problems experienced by participants in MOOC s. The paper concludes that, although MOOC s are a worthwhile experience and ought to be continued, connectivism as a learning theory has significant theoretical problems and should be profoundly revised if it is to explain and foster learning in such environments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Connectivism, which has been argued to be a new learning theory, has emerged in the field of online learning during the last decade. On the W orld W ide W eb at least, connectivism promises to establish learning spaces similar to those that I van I llich imagined in ‘ D eschooling Society ’, through so‐called massive online open courses ( MOOC s). In this paper, we critically examine the theoretical postulates of connectivism and identify three important psychological and epistemological problems, namely the lack of a solution to the learning paradox, the underconceptualization of interaction and the inability to explain concept development. Some of the theoretical deficiencies in question may explain certain learning problems experienced by participants in MOOC s. The paper concludes that, although MOOC s are a worthwhile experience and ought to be continued, connectivism as a learning theory has significant theoretical problems and should be profoundly revised if it is to explain and foster learning in such environments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Connectivism, which has been argued to be a new learning theory, has emerged in the field of online learning during the last decade. On the W orld W ide W eb at least, connectivism promises to establish learning spaces similar to those that I van I llich imagined in ‘ D eschooling Society ’, through so‐called massive online open courses ( MOOC s). In this paper, we critically examine the theoretical postulates of connectivism and identify three important psychological and epistemological problems, namely the lack of a solution to the learning paradox, the underconceptualization of interaction and the inability to explain concept development. Some of the theoretical deficiencies in question may explain certain learning problems experienced by participants in MOOC s. The paper concludes that, although MOOC s are a worthwhile experience and ought to be continued, connectivism as a learning theory has significant theoretical problems and should be profoundly revised if it is to explain and foster learning in such environments.

Key concepts: Connectivism, Learning theory, Field (mathematics), Epistemology, Psychology, Education theory, Educational technology, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning — Research Paper | ScholarLens