Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning
Marc Clarà, Elena Barberà
Abstract
Marc Clarà, Elena Barberà
Abstract
Abstract Connectivism, which has been argued to be a new learning theory, has emerged in the field of online learning during the last decade. On the W orld W ide W eb at least, connectivism promises to establish learning spaces similar to those that I van I llich imagined in ‘ D eschooling Society ’, through so‐called massive online open courses ( MOOC s). In this paper, we critically examine the theoretical postulates of connectivism and identify three important psychological and epistemological problems, namely the lack of a solution to the learning paradox, the underconceptualization of interaction and the inability to explain concept development. Some of the theoretical deficiencies in question may explain certain learning problems experienced by participants in MOOC s. The paper concludes that, although MOOC s are a worthwhile experience and ought to be continued, connectivism as a learning theory has significant theoretical problems and should be profoundly revised if it is to explain and foster learning in such environments.
OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Connectivism, which has been argued to be a new learning theory, has emerged in the field of online learning during the last decade. On the W orld W ide W eb at least, connectivism promises to establish learning spaces similar to those that I van I llich imagined in ‘ D eschooling Society ’, through so‐called massive online open courses ( MOOC s). In this paper, we critically examine the theoretical postulates of connectivism and identify three important psychological and epistemological problems, namely the lack of a solution to the learning paradox, the underconceptualization of interaction and the inability to explain concept development. Some of the theoretical deficiencies in question may explain certain learning problems experienced by participants in MOOC s. The paper concludes that, although MOOC s are a worthwhile experience and ought to be continued, connectivism as a learning theory has significant theoretical problems and should be profoundly revised if it is to explain and foster learning in such environments.
Key concepts: Connectivism, Learning theory, Field (mathematics), Epistemology, Psychology, Education theory, Educational technology, Pedagogy