1998Communication ReportsRequires access

Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style

A. Tanner House, Judith M. Dallinger, Danni‐Lynn Kilgallen

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

As currently conceptualized, both gender and communicator style can be described as the product of many small behaviors that individuals enact throughout the day, as well as filters for interpreting and making sense of human behavior. This study examined whether gender can be expressed productively through communicator style. Both categorical and continuous versions of each of these variables were obtained from survey data using the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) (Bem, 1974) and the RHETSEN scale (Hart, Carlson, & Eadie, 1980). After taking into account the tendency for the diverse individuals included in this sample to respond with high levels on both masculine and feminine items, results generally showed that Rhetorically Sensitive communicators tended to be non‐differentiated in gender role, Noble Selves were more likely to be masculine, and Rhetorical Reflectors were androgynous. BSRI scores suggest that people may now accept the desirability of androgyny and flexibility in gender‐based characteristics. The need for an examination of currently held conceptualizations of gender roles is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As currently conceptualized, both gender and communicator style can be described as the product of many small behaviors that individuals enact throughout the day, as well as filters for interpreting and making sense of human behavior. This study examined whether gender can be expressed productively through communicator style. Both categorical and continuous versions of each of these variables were obtained from survey data using the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) (Bem, 1974) and the RHETSEN scale (Hart, Carlson, & Eadie, 1980). After taking into account the tendency for the diverse individuals included in this sample to respond with high levels on both masculine and feminine items, results generally showed that Rhetorically Sensitive communicators tended to be non‐differentiated in gender role, Noble Selves were more likely to be masculine, and Rhetorical Reflectors were androgynous. BSRI scores suggest that people may now accept the desirability of androgyny and flexibility in gender‐based characteristics. The need for an examination of currently held conceptualizations of gender roles is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As currently conceptualized, both gender and communicator style can be described as the product of many small behaviors that individuals enact throughout the day, as well as filters for interpreting and making sense of human behavior. This study examined whether gender can be expressed productively through communicator style. Both categorical and continuous versions of each of these variables were obtained from survey data using the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) (Bem, 1974) and the RHETSEN scale (Hart, Carlson, & Eadie, 1980). After taking into account the tendency for the diverse individuals included in this sample to respond with high levels on both masculine and feminine items, results generally showed that Rhetorically Sensitive communicators tended to be non‐differentiated in gender role, Noble Selves were more likely to be masculine, and Rhetorical Reflectors were androgynous. BSRI scores suggest that people may now accept the desirability of androgyny and flexibility in gender‐based characteristics. The need for an examination of currently held conceptualizations of gender roles is discussed.

Key concepts: Androgyny, Psychology, Style (visual arts), Social psychology, Rhetorical question, Masculinity, Flexibility (engineering), Bem Sex-Role Inventory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style — Research Paper | ScholarLens