2009National Bureau of Economic ResearchOpen access

Tiebreaker: Certification and Multiple Credit Ratings

Dion Bongaerts, Martijn Cremers, William Goetzmann

Open full text 139 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the economic role credit rating agencies play in the corporate bond market.We consider three existing theories about multiple ratings: information production, rating shopping and regulatory certification.Using differences in rating composition, default prediction and credit spread changes, our evidence only supports regulatory certification.Marginal, additional credit ratings are more likely to occur because of, and seem to matter primarily for regulatory purposes, but do not seem to provide significant additional information related to credit quality.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores the economic role credit rating agencies play in the corporate bond market.We consider three existing theories about multiple ratings: information production, rating shopping and regulatory certification.Using differences in rating composition, default prediction and credit spread changes, our evidence only supports regulatory certification.Marginal, additional credit ratings are more likely to occur because of, and seem to matter primarily for regulatory purposes, but do not seem to provide significant additional information related to credit quality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 139 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores the economic role credit rating agencies play in the corporate bond market.We consider three existing theories about multiple ratings: information production, rating shopping and regulatory certification.Using differences in rating composition, default prediction and credit spread changes, our evidence only supports regulatory certification.Marginal, additional credit ratings are more likely to occur because of, and seem to matter primarily for regulatory purposes, but do not seem to provide significant additional information related to credit quality.

Key concepts: Certification, Credit rating, Business, Actuarial science, Accounting, Econometrics, Economics, Management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tiebreaker: Certification and Multiple Credit Ratings — Research Paper | ScholarLens