External influences on indigenous cultures
Ajita Chakraborty
Abstract
Ajita Chakraborty
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the early days of psychiatry there used to be a tendency towards homogenization. People were thought to be same everywhere quite disregarding the effect of culture on their character. Culture never had a precise definition; lately it has become more diffuse. However as far as our generation understands culture the way people in groups live and think, have particular mores, customs and values constituted psychological make-up of people and gave him his identity (or character/personality). Such self-construction comes under the purview of ‘selfpsychology’, a comparative new line of thought, which is being followed by the author1.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCTION In the early days of psychiatry there used to be a tendency towards homogenization. People were thought to be same everywhere quite disregarding the effect of culture on their character. Culture never had a precise definition; lately it has become more diffuse. However as far as our generation understands culture the way people in groups live and think, have particular mores, customs and values constituted psychological make-up of people and gave him his identity (or character/personality). Such self-construction comes under the purview of ‘selfpsychology’, a comparative new line of thought, which is being followed by the author1.
Key concepts: Mores, Indigenous, Character (mathematics), Personality, Sociology, Identity (music), Epistemology, Social psychology