Evaluation of salivary glucose, IgA and flow rate in diabetic patients: a case-control study.
P. Bakianian Vaziri, Mohammad Vahedi, Hamed Mortazavi, Sh. Abdollahzadeh, Mehrdad Hajilooi
Abstract
P. Bakianian Vaziri, Mohammad Vahedi, Hamed Mortazavi, Sh. Abdollahzadeh, Mehrdad Hajilooi
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An association between diabetes mellitus and alterations in the oral cavity has been noted. In this study, we evaluated differences between salivary IgA, glucose and flow rate in diabetic patients compared with healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with type 1 diabetes, 40 patients with type 2 diabetes and 40 healthy controls were selected. Whole unstimulated saliva samples were collected by the standard method and the salivary flow rate was determined. Nephelometric and Pars method were used to measure salivary IgA and salivary glucose concentrations, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and t test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in salivary IgA and glucose concentrations between type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients and their matched control subjects (P>0.05). Salivary flow rate was significantly lower in diabetic patients (P<0.05). In addition, DMFT was higher in diabetic patients than the controls. CONCLUSION: Determination of salivary constituents may be useful in the description and management of oral findings in diabetic patients.
OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: An association between diabetes mellitus and alterations in the oral cavity has been noted. In this study, we evaluated differences between salivary IgA, glucose and flow rate in diabetic patients compared with healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with type 1 diabetes, 40 patients with type 2 diabetes and 40 healthy controls were selected. Whole unstimulated saliva samples were collected by the standard method and the salivary flow rate was determined. Nephelometric and Pars method were used to measure salivary IgA and salivary glucose concentrations, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and t test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in salivary IgA and glucose concentrations between type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients and their matched control subjects (P>0.05). Salivary flow rate was significantly lower in diabetic patients (P<0.05). In addition, DMFT was higher in diabetic patients than the controls. CONCLUSION: Determination of salivary constituents may be useful in the description and management of oral findings in diabetic patients.
Key concepts: Saliva, Medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Oral cavity, Type 2 diabetes, Type 1 diabetes