2007비평문학Requires access

1920년대 계급문학의 비동일화문학론의 두 양상

조두섭

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study revealed the exclusive discourse of the center of KAPF's proletarian literature in 1920's. It means that the proletarian significance is dependent upon the text. But, KAPF used proletarian's significance as the dogmatism and excluded to the different proletarian literature against their ideology. So, this study revealed to the raising question of a different proletarian literature criticizing the KAPF and correct the true nature of the proletarian literature. The core of a question revealed to the proletarian literature of Jeong Ro Pung and Gweon Gu Hyun. It reveals to their proletarian literature excluding KAPF. I summarized their proletarian literature. KAPF forgot a racial problem as the supernatural power of the proletarian literature. But Jeong Ro Pung disidentificated the KAPF literature as a racial problem of the excluding KAPF. KAPF authorized the part spirit with the proletarian literature. Gweon Gu Hyun is dissolved to the KAPF literature as the proletarian conscience.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study revealed the exclusive discourse of the center of KAPF's proletarian literature in 1920's. It means that the proletarian significance is dependent upon the text. But, KAPF used proletarian's significance as the dogmatism and excluded to the different proletarian literature against their ideology. So, this study revealed to the raising question of a different proletarian literature criticizing the KAPF and correct the true nature of the proletarian literature. The core of a question revealed to the proletarian literature of Jeong Ro Pung and Gweon Gu Hyun. It reveals to their proletarian literature excluding KAPF. I summarized their proletarian literature. KAPF forgot a racial problem as the supernatural power of the proletarian literature. But Jeong Ro Pung disidentificated the KAPF literature as a racial problem of the excluding KAPF. KAPF authorized the part spirit with the proletarian literature. Gweon Gu Hyun is dissolved to the KAPF literature as the proletarian conscience.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study revealed the exclusive discourse of the center of KAPF's proletarian literature in 1920's. It means that the proletarian significance is dependent upon the text. But, KAPF used proletarian's significance as the dogmatism and excluded to the different proletarian literature against their ideology. So, this study revealed to the raising question of a different proletarian literature criticizing the KAPF and correct the true nature of the proletarian literature. The core of a question revealed to the proletarian literature of Jeong Ro Pung and Gweon Gu Hyun. It reveals to their proletarian literature excluding KAPF. I summarized their proletarian literature. KAPF forgot a racial problem as the supernatural power of the proletarian literature. But Jeong Ro Pung disidentificated the KAPF literature as a racial problem of the excluding KAPF. KAPF authorized the part spirit with the proletarian literature. Gweon Gu Hyun is dissolved to the KAPF literature as the proletarian conscience.

Key concepts: Proletariat, Ideology, Political science, Law, Politics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
1920년대 계급문학의 비동일화문학론의 두 양상 — Research Paper | ScholarLens