Government under the Law: The Ebb and Flow of Sovereignty in Australia
Suri Ratnapala
Abstract
Suri Ratnapala
Abstract
The 'Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd.' (Engineers' case) doctrine, formulated in 1920, drastically reduced the restrictive potential of the Constitution, thereby shifting it towards the sovereignty model. However, the High Court of Australia implied constitutional rights contradicting with the Engineers' doctrine in the 1990s, since it did not agree with the fundamental features of the Constitution, namely separation of powers, representative principle the rule of law and federal structure, thereby shifting it from a sovereign model to the republican model.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The 'Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd.' (Engineers' case) doctrine, formulated in 1920, drastically reduced the restrictive potential of the Constitution, thereby shifting it towards the sovereignty model. However, the High Court of Australia implied constitutional rights contradicting with the Engineers' doctrine in the 1990s, since it did not agree with the fundamental features of the Constitution, namely separation of powers, representative principle the rule of law and federal structure, thereby shifting it from a sovereign model to the republican model.
Key concepts: Constitution, Parliamentary sovereignty, Doctrine, Sovereignty, Law, Separation of powers, Project commissioning, Political science