2008British Journal of RadiologyRequires access

Estimation of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: standard anteroposterior scansvssub-regional analyses of whole-body scans

Mihail Boyanov

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L(1)-L(4) DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB-LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L(1)-L(4) BMD from the WB-LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L(1)-L(4) T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84+/-9.69 years; range, 21-74 years). AP L(1)-L(4) BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB-LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p<0.001). A power model for BMC (R(2) = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R(2) = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L(1)-L(4) and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of -2.35 and -0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB-LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L(1)-L(4) DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB-LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L(1)-L(4) BMD from the WB-LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L(1)-L(4) T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84+/-9.69 years; range, 21-74 years). AP L(1)-L(4) BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB-LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p<0.001). A power model for BMC (R(2) = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R(2) = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L(1)-L(4) and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of -2.35 and -0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB-LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L(1)-L(4) DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB-LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L(1)-L(4) BMD from the WB-LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L(1)-L(4) T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84+/-9.69 years; range, 21-74 years). AP L(1)-L(4) BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB-LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p<0.001). A power model for BMC (R(2) = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R(2) = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L(1)-L(4) and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of -2.35 and -0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB-LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD.

Key concepts: Bone mineral, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Densitometer, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Bone mineral content, Dual energy, Lumbar spine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estimation of lumbar spine bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: standard anteroposterior scansvssub-regional analyses of whole-body scans — Research Paper | ScholarLens