Value of Transducer Positions in the Measurement of Finger Flexor Tendon Thickness by Sonography
Andrea Sabine Klauser, Karl‐Heinz Stadlbauer, Ferdinand Frauscher, Manfred Herold, Guenther Klima, Michael Schirmer, Dieter zur Nedden
Abstract
Andrea Sabine Klauser, Karl‐Heinz Stadlbauer, Ferdinand Frauscher, Manfred Herold, Guenther Klima, Michael Schirmer, Dieter zur Nedden
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of 2 transducer positions for measurement of finger flexor tendon thickness by sonography. METHODS: Flexor tendon thickness of the third finger was measured sonographically by 2 independent investigators in 20 healthy volunteers (n = 40 fingers) and in 4 cadaveric specimens (n = 4 fingers). Flexor tendon thickness was measured at histologic examination in the cadaveric specimens. We defined the area of the A1 annular pulley as position I and the area of the A2 annular pulley as position II. Sonographic measurements were performed in transverse (dorsovolar and radioulnar) and longitudinal planes. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were evaluated by each investigator performing 3 measurements at each position. RESULTS: In position I, volunteers had flexor tendon thickness of 2.7 to 4.0 mm (mean +/- SD, 3.28 +/- 0.26 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.5 to 4.0 mm (mean, 3.34 +/- 0.29 mm) dorsovolar and 5.5 to 8.9 mm (mean, 7.34 +/- 0.71) radioulnar in position I. Position II revealed thickness of 3.2 to 4.2 mm (mean, 3.6 +/- 0.23 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.7 to 4.1 mm (mean, 3.4 +/- 0.27) dorsovolar and 4.3 to 6.8 mm (mean, 5.27 +/- 0.65) radioulnar. Interobserver and intraobserver variability for position I was better than for position II (P < .01 versus P < .05). Sonographic findings correlated excellently with histologic findings (r2 = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized transducer positions for sonographic measurements of finger flexor tendon thickness showed good interobserver and intraobserver variability. Position I was found to be more reliable than position II.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of 2 transducer positions for measurement of finger flexor tendon thickness by sonography. METHODS: Flexor tendon thickness of the third finger was measured sonographically by 2 independent investigators in 20 healthy volunteers (n = 40 fingers) and in 4 cadaveric specimens (n = 4 fingers). Flexor tendon thickness was measured at histologic examination in the cadaveric specimens. We defined the area of the A1 annular pulley as position I and the area of the A2 annular pulley as position II. Sonographic measurements were performed in transverse (dorsovolar and radioulnar) and longitudinal planes. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were evaluated by each investigator performing 3 measurements at each position. RESULTS: In position I, volunteers had flexor tendon thickness of 2.7 to 4.0 mm (mean +/- SD, 3.28 +/- 0.26 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.5 to 4.0 mm (mean, 3.34 +/- 0.29 mm) dorsovolar and 5.5 to 8.9 mm (mean, 7.34 +/- 0.71) radioulnar in position I. Position II revealed thickness of 3.2 to 4.2 mm (mean, 3.6 +/- 0.23 mm) longitudinally; transversally the thickness was 2.7 to 4.1 mm (mean, 3.4 +/- 0.27) dorsovolar and 4.3 to 6.8 mm (mean, 5.27 +/- 0.65) radioulnar. Interobserver and intraobserver variability for position I was better than for position II (P < .01 versus P < .05). Sonographic findings correlated excellently with histologic findings (r2 = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized transducer positions for sonographic measurements of finger flexor tendon thickness showed good interobserver and intraobserver variability. Position I was found to be more reliable than position II.
Key concepts: Medicine, Tendon, Value (mathematics), Transducer, Anatomy, Biomedical engineering, Acoustics, Computer science