Tracking user goals in an information-seeking environment
Sandra Carberry
Abstract
Sandra Carberry
Abstract
This paper presents a model for hypothesizing and tracking the changing task-level goals of a speaker during the course of an information-seeking dialogue. It allows a complex set of domain-dependent plans, forming a hierarchial structure of component goals and actions. Our model builds the user's plan as the dialogue progresses, maintains both a local and a global plan context, and differentiates between past goals and goals currently pursued by the user. This research is part of a project to develop a robust natural language interface. If an utterance cannot be interpreted normally or a response cannot be generated due to pragmatic overshoot, the strong expectations about the utterance provided by our context model can be used as an aid in processing the input and producing useful responses.
OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper presents a model for hypothesizing and tracking the changing task-level goals of a speaker during the course of an information-seeking dialogue. It allows a complex set of domain-dependent plans, forming a hierarchial structure of component goals and actions. Our model builds the user's plan as the dialogue progresses, maintains both a local and a global plan context, and differentiates between past goals and goals currently pursued by the user. This research is part of a project to develop a robust natural language interface. If an utterance cannot be interpreted normally or a response cannot be generated due to pragmatic overshoot, the strong expectations about the utterance provided by our context model can be used as an aid in processing the input and producing useful responses.
Key concepts: Utterance, Computer science, Context (archaeology), Human–computer interaction, Set (abstract data type), Plan (archaeology), Task (project management), Component (thermodynamics)