1985Journal of Clinical InvestigationOpen access

Mechanics of intercostal space and actions of external and internal intercostal muscles.

André De Troyer, Suzanne M. Kelly, Peter T. Macklem, Walter A. Zin

Open full text 88 citations

Abstract

It is conventionally considered that because of their fiber orientations, the external intercostal muscles elevate the ribs, whereas the internal interosseous intercostals lower the ribs. The mechanical action of the intercostal muscles, however, has never been studied directly, and the electromyographic observations supporting this conventional thinking must be interpreted with caution. In the present studies, the external and internal interosseous intercostal muscles have been separately stimulated in different interspaces at, above, and below end-expiratory rib cage volume in anesthetized dogs. The axial (cephalo-caudal) displacements of the ribs were measured using linear displacement transducers. The results indicate that when contracting in a single interspace and other muscles are relaxed, both the external and internal intercostals have a net rib elevating action at end-expiratory rib cage volume. This action increases as rib cage volume decreases, but it progressively decreases as rib cage volume increases such that at high rib cage volumes, both the external and internal intercostals lower the ribs. Stimulating the intercostal muscles in three adjacent intercostal spaces simultaneously produced similar directional rib motion results. We conclude that (a) in contrast with the conventional thinking, the external and internal interosseous intercostals acting alone have by and large a similar effect on the ribs into which they insert; (b) this effect is very much dependent on rib cage (lung) volume; and (c) intercostal muscle action is primarily determined by the resistance of the upper ribs to caudad displacement relative to the resistance of the lower ribs to cephalad displacement. The lateral intercostals, however, might be more involved in postural movements than in respiration. Their primary involvement in rotations of the trunk might account for the presence of two differently oriented muscle layers between the ribs.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is conventionally considered that because of their fiber orientations, the external intercostal muscles elevate the ribs, whereas the internal interosseous intercostals lower the ribs. The mechanical action of the intercostal muscles, however, has never been studied directly, and the electromyographic observations supporting this conventional thinking must be interpreted with caution. In the present studies, the external and internal interosseous intercostal muscles have been separately stimulated in different interspaces at, above, and below end-expiratory rib cage volume in anesthetized dogs. The axial (cephalo-caudal) displacements of the ribs were measured using linear displacement transducers. The results indicate that when contracting in a single interspace and other muscles are relaxed, both the external and internal intercostals have a net rib elevating action at end-expiratory rib cage volume. This action increases as rib cage volume decreases, but it progressively decreases as rib cage volume increases such that at high rib cage volumes, both the external and internal intercostals lower the ribs. Stimulating the intercostal muscles in three adjacent intercostal spaces simultaneously produced similar directional rib motion results. We conclude that (a) in contrast with the conventional thinking, the external and internal interosseous intercostals acting alone have by and large a similar effect on the ribs into which they insert; (b) this effect is very much dependent on rib cage (lung) volume; and (c) intercostal muscle action is primarily determined by the resistance of the upper ribs to caudad displacement relative to the resistance of the lower ribs to cephalad displacement. The lateral intercostals, however, might be more involved in postural movements than in respiration. Their primary involvement in rotations of the trunk might account for the presence of two differently oriented muscle layers between the ribs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 88 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is conventionally considered that because of their fiber orientations, the external intercostal muscles elevate the ribs, whereas the internal interosseous intercostals lower the ribs. The mechanical action of the intercostal muscles, however, has never been studied directly, and the electromyographic observations supporting this conventional thinking must be interpreted with caution. In the present studies, the external and internal interosseous intercostal muscles have been separately stimulated in different interspaces at, above, and below end-expiratory rib cage volume in anesthetized dogs. The axial (cephalo-caudal) displacements of the ribs were measured using linear displacement transducers. The results indicate that when contracting in a single interspace and other muscles are relaxed, both the external and internal intercostals have a net rib elevating action at end-expiratory rib cage volume. This action increases as rib cage volume decreases, but it progressively decreases as rib cage volume increases such that at high rib cage volumes, both the external and internal intercostals lower the ribs. Stimulating the intercostal muscles in three adjacent intercostal spaces simultaneously produced similar directional rib motion results. We conclude that (a) in contrast with the conventional thinking, the external and internal interosseous intercostals acting alone have by and large a similar effect on the ribs into which they insert; (b) this effect is very much dependent on rib cage (lung) volume; and (c) intercostal muscle action is primarily determined by the resistance of the upper ribs to caudad displacement relative to the resistance of the lower ribs to cephalad displacement. The lateral intercostals, however, might be more involved in postural movements than in respiration. Their primary involvement in rotations of the trunk might account for the presence of two differently oriented muscle layers between the ribs.

Key concepts: Rib cage, Intercostal muscle, Anatomy, Muscles of respiration, Intercostal space, Displacement (psychology), Medicine, Respiratory system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mechanics of intercostal space and actions of external and internal intercostal muscles. — Research Paper | ScholarLens