1999Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsRequires access

Addressing the issue of sequence-to-structure alignments in comparative modeling of CASP3 target proteins

?eslovas Venclovas, Krzysztof Ginalski, Krzysztof Fidelis

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/casp3/) , four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 62%, 29%, 24%, and 19% sequence identity, respectively, to the structurally homologous proteins most similar in sequence. The issue of sequence-to-structure alignment in cases of low sequence homology was the main emphasis. Selection of alignments was made by constructing and evaluating three-dimensional models based on series of samples produced mainly by automatic multiple sequence alignments. Sequence-to-structure alignments were correct in all but two regions, in which significant changes in target structures compared with related proteins were the source of errors. Template choice is an important determinant of model quality, and a correct selection was made of a lower homology template for modeling of T0070; however, in the case of T0055, a template with 8% greater sequence homology proved deceptive. Loops and some ungapped template regions were assigned conformations taken from other proteins. Using fragments from homologous structures led to improvement over template backbone more often than cases in which nonhomologous structures were the source. The results also indicate that side-chain prediction accuracy depends not only on sequence similarity but also on accuracy of the backbone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/casp3/) , four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 62%, 29%, 24%, and 19% sequence identity, respectively, to the structurally homologous proteins most similar in sequence. The issue of sequence-to-structure alignment in cases of low sequence homology was the main emphasis. Selection of alignments was made by constructing and evaluating three-dimensional models based on series of samples produced mainly by automatic multiple sequence alignments. Sequence-to-structure alignments were correct in all but two regions, in which significant changes in target structures compared with related proteins were the source of errors. Template choice is an important determinant of model quality, and a correct selection was made of a lower homology template for modeling of T0070; however, in the case of T0055, a template with 8% greater sequence homology proved deceptive. Loops and some ungapped template regions were assigned conformations taken from other proteins. Using fragments from homologous structures led to improvement over template backbone more often than cases in which nonhomologous structures were the source. The results also indicate that side-chain prediction accuracy depends not only on sequence similarity but also on accuracy of the backbone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/casp3/) , four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 62%, 29%, 24%, and 19% sequence identity, respectively, to the structurally homologous proteins most similar in sequence. The issue of sequence-to-structure alignment in cases of low sequence homology was the main emphasis. Selection of alignments was made by constructing and evaluating three-dimensional models based on series of samples produced mainly by automatic multiple sequence alignments. Sequence-to-structure alignments were correct in all but two regions, in which significant changes in target structures compared with related proteins were the source of errors. Template choice is an important determinant of model quality, and a correct selection was made of a lower homology template for modeling of T0070; however, in the case of T0055, a template with 8% greater sequence homology proved deceptive. Loops and some ungapped template regions were assigned conformations taken from other proteins. Using fragments from homologous structures led to improvement over template backbone more often than cases in which nonhomologous structures were the source. The results also indicate that side-chain prediction accuracy depends not only on sequence similarity but also on accuracy of the backbone.

Key concepts: Loop modeling, Homology modeling, Threading (protein sequence), Protein superfamily, Computational biology, Sequence alignment, Sequence (biology), Homology (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Addressing the issue of sequence-to-structure alignments in comparative modeling of CASP3 target proteins — Research Paper | ScholarLens