1989American Journal of HypertensionRequires access

Differentiation of Angiotensin–Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors by Their Selective Inhibition of ACE in Physiologically Important Target Organs

David W. Cushman, F. L. Wang, Wing Chiu Fung, Charlotte M. Harvey, Jack M. DeForrest

Open publisher page 197 citations

Abstract

Seven ACE inhibitors were studied for possible differences in distribution to aorta, brain, heart, lung, and kidney after administration of single oral doses to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Doses, normalized for differences in inhibitory potency and molecular weight, were expected to deliver equivalent levels of ACE-inhibitory activity to the circulation, and this was confirmed by preliminary dose-response studies. The relative potencies of the active moieties of the seven drugs and the normalized oral doses used were: SQ 29,852 (1.0), 100 mg/kg; captopril (3.5), 30 mg/kg; enalapril (12), 20 mg/kg; fosinopril (13), 25 mg/kg; zofenopril (20), 10 mg/kg; lisinopril (24), 10 mg/kg; and ramipril (51), 5 mg/kg. In these ex vivo studies, ACE activities were determined fluorometrically in SHR sera and in uncentrifuged homogenates of the solid tissues at various times after oral dosing with the ACE inhibitors. As expected, the normalized oral doses of the seven inhibitors had equivalent effects on serum ACE. In lung, where ACE has a vascular endothelial localization, and in aorta, where ACE inhibition correlates with antihypertensive action, ramipril, lisinopril, and zofenopril were distinguished by the magnitude and duration (three to four days) of their effects. In the brain, where ACE may affect central regulation of blood pressure and participate in the degradation of certain neuropeptides, ramipril and enalapril had no effect; captopril and zofenopril had modest, short-lasting effects, and fosinopril, lisinopril, and SQ 29,852 had delayed but long-lasting inhibitory actions. In the kidney, where ACE inhibition may have positive or negative effects on renal function, ramipril and fosinopril could be distinguished by their weak actions, perhaps associated with biliary routes of excretion. In the heart, where ACE inhibitors may prevent ischemic damage to the myocardium, single oral doses of captopril, fosinopril, and particularly zofenopril produced striking and long-lasting inhibition, whereas equivalent doses of ramipril and enalapril produced barely detectable inhibition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seven ACE inhibitors were studied for possible differences in distribution to aorta, brain, heart, lung, and kidney after administration of single oral doses to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Doses, normalized for differences in inhibitory potency and molecular weight, were expected to deliver equivalent levels of ACE-inhibitory activity to the circulation, and this was confirmed by preliminary dose-response studies. The relative potencies of the active moieties of the seven drugs and the normalized oral doses used were: SQ 29,852 (1.0), 100 mg/kg; captopril (3.5), 30 mg/kg; enalapril (12), 20 mg/kg; fosinopril (13), 25 mg/kg; zofenopril (20), 10 mg/kg; lisinopril (24), 10 mg/kg; and ramipril (51), 5 mg/kg. In these ex vivo studies, ACE activities were determined fluorometrically in SHR sera and in uncentrifuged homogenates of the solid tissues at various times after oral dosing with the ACE inhibitors. As expected, the normalized oral doses of the seven inhibitors had equivalent effects on serum ACE. In lung, where ACE has a vascular endothelial localization, and in aorta, where ACE inhibition correlates with antihypertensive action, ramipril, lisinopril, and zofenopril were distinguished by the magnitude and duration (three to four days) of their effects. In the brain, where ACE may affect central regulation of blood pressure and participate in the degradation of certain neuropeptides, ramipril and enalapril had no effect; captopril and zofenopril had modest, short-lasting effects, and fosinopril, lisinopril, and SQ 29,852 had delayed but long-lasting inhibitory actions. In the kidney, where ACE inhibition may have positive or negative effects on renal function, ramipril and fosinopril could be distinguished by their weak actions, perhaps associated with biliary routes of excretion. In the heart, where ACE inhibitors may prevent ischemic damage to the myocardium, single oral doses of captopril, fosinopril, and particularly zofenopril produced striking and long-lasting inhibition, whereas equivalent doses of ramipril and enalapril produced barely detectable inhibition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 197 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seven ACE inhibitors were studied for possible differences in distribution to aorta, brain, heart, lung, and kidney after administration of single oral doses to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Doses, normalized for differences in inhibitory potency and molecular weight, were expected to deliver equivalent levels of ACE-inhibitory activity to the circulation, and this was confirmed by preliminary dose-response studies. The relative potencies of the active moieties of the seven drugs and the normalized oral doses used were: SQ 29,852 (1.0), 100 mg/kg; captopril (3.5), 30 mg/kg; enalapril (12), 20 mg/kg; fosinopril (13), 25 mg/kg; zofenopril (20), 10 mg/kg; lisinopril (24), 10 mg/kg; and ramipril (51), 5 mg/kg. In these ex vivo studies, ACE activities were determined fluorometrically in SHR sera and in uncentrifuged homogenates of the solid tissues at various times after oral dosing with the ACE inhibitors. As expected, the normalized oral doses of the seven inhibitors had equivalent effects on serum ACE. In lung, where ACE has a vascular endothelial localization, and in aorta, where ACE inhibition correlates with antihypertensive action, ramipril, lisinopril, and zofenopril were distinguished by the magnitude and duration (three to four days) of their effects. In the brain, where ACE may affect central regulation of blood pressure and participate in the degradation of certain neuropeptides, ramipril and enalapril had no effect; captopril and zofenopril had modest, short-lasting effects, and fosinopril, lisinopril, and SQ 29,852 had delayed but long-lasting inhibitory actions. In the kidney, where ACE inhibition may have positive or negative effects on renal function, ramipril and fosinopril could be distinguished by their weak actions, perhaps associated with biliary routes of excretion. In the heart, where ACE inhibitors may prevent ischemic damage to the myocardium, single oral doses of captopril, fosinopril, and particularly zofenopril produced striking and long-lasting inhibition, whereas equivalent doses of ramipril and enalapril produced barely detectable inhibition.

Key concepts: Ramipril, Fosinopril, Captopril, Lisinopril, Enalapril, ACE inhibitor, Medicine, Angiotensin-converting enzyme

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differentiation of Angiotensin–Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors by Their Selective Inhibition of ACE in Physiologically Important Target Organs — Research Paper | ScholarLens