2013Muscle & NerveRequires access

Responses of finger flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation during isometric force production tasks

Woo-Hyung Park, Sheng Li

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated neural mechanisms of finger force control. METHODS: Ten right-handed subjects performed isometric finger flexion and extension force productions at 10-60% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) using 4 fingers of the dominant hand. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral hand motor area. We measured fluctuation of the background force and TMS responses from finger flexor and extensor muscles. RESULTS: Force fluctuation was greater during finger extension than during finger flexion. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) increased with force levels in the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) during finger flexion and in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) during finger extension. TMS-induced forces increased up to 40% MVC and then decreased during finger flexion, whereas they decreased continuously through the tested force levels during finger extension. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FDS and EDC are controlled by different neural mechanisms, most likely attributable to their different functional roles in daily activities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated neural mechanisms of finger force control. METHODS: Ten right-handed subjects performed isometric finger flexion and extension force productions at 10-60% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) using 4 fingers of the dominant hand. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral hand motor area. We measured fluctuation of the background force and TMS responses from finger flexor and extensor muscles. RESULTS: Force fluctuation was greater during finger extension than during finger flexion. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) increased with force levels in the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) during finger flexion and in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) during finger extension. TMS-induced forces increased up to 40% MVC and then decreased during finger flexion, whereas they decreased continuously through the tested force levels during finger extension. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FDS and EDC are controlled by different neural mechanisms, most likely attributable to their different functional roles in daily activities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated neural mechanisms of finger force control. METHODS: Ten right-handed subjects performed isometric finger flexion and extension force productions at 10-60% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) using 4 fingers of the dominant hand. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral hand motor area. We measured fluctuation of the background force and TMS responses from finger flexor and extensor muscles. RESULTS: Force fluctuation was greater during finger extension than during finger flexion. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) increased with force levels in the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) during finger flexion and in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) during finger extension. TMS-induced forces increased up to 40% MVC and then decreased during finger flexion, whereas they decreased continuously through the tested force levels during finger extension. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FDS and EDC are controlled by different neural mechanisms, most likely attributable to their different functional roles in daily activities.

Key concepts: Isometric exercise, Extensor Digitorum Communis, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Flexor muscles, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Anatomy, Medicine, Hand muscles

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Responses of finger flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation during isometric force production tasks — Research Paper | ScholarLens