2013Current Pharmaceutical DesignRequires access

Hydrochlorothiazide vs. Chlorthalidone as the Optimal Diuretic for the Management of Hypertension

Κωνσταντίνος Τζιόμαλος, Vassilios G. Athyros, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, andAsterios Karagiannis

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Even though hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and chlorthalidone are frequently considered interchangeable antihypertensive agents, they appear to differ both in their blood pressure lowering efficacy and in their effects on the lipid profile and on serum potassium, uric acid and glucose levels. More importantly, in randomized controlled trials, chlorthalidone was equally or more effective than other antihypertensive agents in cardiovascular risk reduction whereas treatment with HCTZ yielded conflicting results. Although there are no randomized trials comparing the effects of these two agents on cardiovascular events, retrospective data from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial suggest that chlorthalidone might reduce cardiovascular morbidity more than HCTZ. However, current guidelines do not consistently recommend one or the other and it remains to be established which one is the diuretic of choice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Even though hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and chlorthalidone are frequently considered interchangeable antihypertensive agents, they appear to differ both in their blood pressure lowering efficacy and in their effects on the lipid profile and on serum potassium, uric acid and glucose levels. More importantly, in randomized controlled trials, chlorthalidone was equally or more effective than other antihypertensive agents in cardiovascular risk reduction whereas treatment with HCTZ yielded conflicting results. Although there are no randomized trials comparing the effects of these two agents on cardiovascular events, retrospective data from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial suggest that chlorthalidone might reduce cardiovascular morbidity more than HCTZ. However, current guidelines do not consistently recommend one or the other and it remains to be established which one is the diuretic of choice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Even though hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and chlorthalidone are frequently considered interchangeable antihypertensive agents, they appear to differ both in their blood pressure lowering efficacy and in their effects on the lipid profile and on serum potassium, uric acid and glucose levels. More importantly, in randomized controlled trials, chlorthalidone was equally or more effective than other antihypertensive agents in cardiovascular risk reduction whereas treatment with HCTZ yielded conflicting results. Although there are no randomized trials comparing the effects of these two agents on cardiovascular events, retrospective data from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial suggest that chlorthalidone might reduce cardiovascular morbidity more than HCTZ. However, current guidelines do not consistently recommend one or the other and it remains to be established which one is the diuretic of choice.

Key concepts: Chlorthalidone, Hydrochlorothiazide, Diuretic, Medicine, Benzothiadiazines, Pharmacology, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hydrochlorothiazide vs. Chlorthalidone as the Optimal Diuretic for the Management of Hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens