1981International Journal of Computer MathematicsRequires access

On sparse and compact preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for partial differential equations

D. J. Evans, Elias A. Lipitakis, N.M. Mussirlis

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper generalises the preconditioning techniques, introduced by Evans [2], and defines sparse and compact preconditioned iterative methods for the numerical solution of the linear system Au = b.The difference between the methods is shown to depend on whether a conditioning matrix R consists of components derived from a splitting or factorization of A. Some theoretical results for the iterative schemes are given when A has particular properties such as consistent ordering, irreducibility, diagonal dominance, positive definiteness, etc., when derived from the finite difference discretisation of a 2nd order self-adjoint elliptic partial differential equation. Finally, the application of both forms of preconditioning to the Conjugate Gradient method is presented and computational results compared.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper generalises the preconditioning techniques, introduced by Evans [2], and defines sparse and compact preconditioned iterative methods for the numerical solution of the linear system Au = b.The difference between the methods is shown to depend on whether a conditioning matrix R consists of components derived from a splitting or factorization of A. Some theoretical results for the iterative schemes are given when A has particular properties such as consistent ordering, irreducibility, diagonal dominance, positive definiteness, etc., when derived from the finite difference discretisation of a 2nd order self-adjoint elliptic partial differential equation. Finally, the application of both forms of preconditioning to the Conjugate Gradient method is presented and computational results compared.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper generalises the preconditioning techniques, introduced by Evans [2], and defines sparse and compact preconditioned iterative methods for the numerical solution of the linear system Au = b.The difference between the methods is shown to depend on whether a conditioning matrix R consists of components derived from a splitting or factorization of A. Some theoretical results for the iterative schemes are given when A has particular properties such as consistent ordering, irreducibility, diagonal dominance, positive definiteness, etc., when derived from the finite difference discretisation of a 2nd order self-adjoint elliptic partial differential equation. Finally, the application of both forms of preconditioning to the Conjugate Gradient method is presented and computational results compared.

Key concepts: Conjugate gradient method, Mathematics, Diagonally dominant matrix, Irreducibility, Applied mathematics, Iterative method, Discretization, Partial differential equation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On sparse and compact preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for partial differential equations — Research Paper | ScholarLens