2003International Journal of Paediatric DentistryRequires access

The post‐amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions

H. Forss, Eeva Widström

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the last decade there has been a rapid change in the selection of dental restorative materials as the use of amalgam has decreased. The aim of this study was to obtain information on children's restorative dental care in Finland and to analyse the longevity of failed restorations. DESIGN: A random sample of public dental health care centres was drawn from the registers and the dentists working there were asked to record information for each restoration they placed during a three-day period. The survey data comprised a total of 2186 restorations in patients younger than 17 years. RESULTS: Of the children in need of restorative treatment, only a few had previous amalgam restorations. Primary caries was the main reason for restorative treatment in both primary and permanent dentitions (80% and 83%, respectively). In primary teeth, the most common restorative material was resin-modified glass ionomer cement (57.4%), whereas in permanent teeth, composite resin dominated (58.7%). Amalgam was not used at all in the primary dentition and in only 0.6% of permanent teeth. Eighteen per cent of treatments in primary and 12% in permanent teeth were replacements of previous fillings. The mean age of failed glass ionomer restorations was 2.8 years (n = 101) in the primary dentition, and 3.5 years (n = 54) in the permanent dentition. CONCLUSIONS: Until better restorative materials are developed, more attention should be paid to the prevention of dental caries as well as to the proper handling of alternative materials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: During the last decade there has been a rapid change in the selection of dental restorative materials as the use of amalgam has decreased. The aim of this study was to obtain information on children's restorative dental care in Finland and to analyse the longevity of failed restorations. DESIGN: A random sample of public dental health care centres was drawn from the registers and the dentists working there were asked to record information for each restoration they placed during a three-day period. The survey data comprised a total of 2186 restorations in patients younger than 17 years. RESULTS: Of the children in need of restorative treatment, only a few had previous amalgam restorations. Primary caries was the main reason for restorative treatment in both primary and permanent dentitions (80% and 83%, respectively). In primary teeth, the most common restorative material was resin-modified glass ionomer cement (57.4%), whereas in permanent teeth, composite resin dominated (58.7%). Amalgam was not used at all in the primary dentition and in only 0.6% of permanent teeth. Eighteen per cent of treatments in primary and 12% in permanent teeth were replacements of previous fillings. The mean age of failed glass ionomer restorations was 2.8 years (n = 101) in the primary dentition, and 3.5 years (n = 54) in the permanent dentition. CONCLUSIONS: Until better restorative materials are developed, more attention should be paid to the prevention of dental caries as well as to the proper handling of alternative materials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the last decade there has been a rapid change in the selection of dental restorative materials as the use of amalgam has decreased. The aim of this study was to obtain information on children's restorative dental care in Finland and to analyse the longevity of failed restorations. DESIGN: A random sample of public dental health care centres was drawn from the registers and the dentists working there were asked to record information for each restoration they placed during a three-day period. The survey data comprised a total of 2186 restorations in patients younger than 17 years. RESULTS: Of the children in need of restorative treatment, only a few had previous amalgam restorations. Primary caries was the main reason for restorative treatment in both primary and permanent dentitions (80% and 83%, respectively). In primary teeth, the most common restorative material was resin-modified glass ionomer cement (57.4%), whereas in permanent teeth, composite resin dominated (58.7%). Amalgam was not used at all in the primary dentition and in only 0.6% of permanent teeth. Eighteen per cent of treatments in primary and 12% in permanent teeth were replacements of previous fillings. The mean age of failed glass ionomer restorations was 2.8 years (n = 101) in the primary dentition, and 3.5 years (n = 54) in the permanent dentition. CONCLUSIONS: Until better restorative materials are developed, more attention should be paid to the prevention of dental caries as well as to the proper handling of alternative materials.

Key concepts: Amalgam (chemistry), Medicine, Dentistry, Permanent dentition, Dentition, Permanent teeth, Permanent tooth, Glass ionomer cement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The post‐amalgam era: a selection of materials and their longevity in the primary and young permanent dentitions — Research Paper | ScholarLens