2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Relevance Feedback Query Refinement for PDF Medical Journal Articles

Antoine Christiansen, D.J. Lee

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses relevance feedback as an alternative to keyword-based search engines for sifting through large PDF document collections and extracting the most relevant documents (especially for literature review purposes). Until now, relevance feedback has only been used in content-based image and video retrieval due to the inability to query those media types without keywords. Since PDF journal articles contain many valuable non-keyword features such as structure and formatting information as well as embedded figures, they would benefit from relevance feedback. Stripping a PDF into "full-text" for indexing purposes disregards these important features. We discuss how they can be used to our advantage and look to integrate the wealth of knowledge from relevance feedback text-based information retrieval. We argue for the benefits of placing the burden of relevance judgement on the user rather than the retrieval system and present alternative document views that quickly allow the user to deem relevance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper addresses relevance feedback as an alternative to keyword-based search engines for sifting through large PDF document collections and extracting the most relevant documents (especially for literature review purposes). Until now, relevance feedback has only been used in content-based image and video retrieval due to the inability to query those media types without keywords. Since PDF journal articles contain many valuable non-keyword features such as structure and formatting information as well as embedded figures, they would benefit from relevance feedback. Stripping a PDF into "full-text" for indexing purposes disregards these important features. We discuss how they can be used to our advantage and look to integrate the wealth of knowledge from relevance feedback text-based information retrieval. We argue for the benefits of placing the burden of relevance judgement on the user rather than the retrieval system and present alternative document views that quickly allow the user to deem relevance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper addresses relevance feedback as an alternative to keyword-based search engines for sifting through large PDF document collections and extracting the most relevant documents (especially for literature review purposes). Until now, relevance feedback has only been used in content-based image and video retrieval due to the inability to query those media types without keywords. Since PDF journal articles contain many valuable non-keyword features such as structure and formatting information as well as embedded figures, they would benefit from relevance feedback. Stripping a PDF into "full-text" for indexing purposes disregards these important features. We discuss how they can be used to our advantage and look to integrate the wealth of knowledge from relevance feedback text-based information retrieval. We argue for the benefits of placing the burden of relevance judgement on the user rather than the retrieval system and present alternative document views that quickly allow the user to deem relevance.

Key concepts: Relevance (law), Relevance feedback, Information retrieval, Computer science, Search engine indexing, Disk formatting, Judgement, World Wide Web

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relevance Feedback Query Refinement for PDF Medical Journal Articles — Research Paper | ScholarLens