ScholarLens Back to search
2002•Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewOpen access

Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition

Andrés Catena, Luis J. Fuentes, Pı́o Tudela

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Stroop effect, Automaticity, Priming (agriculture), Psychology, Negative priming, Cognitive psychology, Task (project management), Interference (communication)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: New evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition — Research Paper | ScholarLens