1998Human ReproductionOpen access

Artificial insemination by husband in unexplained infertility compared with infertility associated with peritoneal endometriosis

Anne Katerine Omland, Tom Tanbo, Per Olav Dale, Thomas Åbyholm

Open full text 56 citations

Abstract

There have been numerous inconclusive studies examining the differences between unexplained and peritoneal endometriosis-associated infertility. Hence, the choice of artificial reproductive technique may be difficult. This prospective study compares outcome in couples with unexplained infertility and with minimal or mild endometriosis-associated infertility, undergoing treatment with ovarian stimulation combined with artificial insemination by husband. No differences were found between the unexplained infertile and the endometriosis group as to patient characteristics, response to ovarian stimulation and semen qualities. There was a significantly higher total pregnancy rate, with more multiple gestations, in the unexplained infertile compared with the endometriosis group. The difference in outcome could reflect differences in pathogenesis and aetiology for the two groups.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There have been numerous inconclusive studies examining the differences between unexplained and peritoneal endometriosis-associated infertility. Hence, the choice of artificial reproductive technique may be difficult. This prospective study compares outcome in couples with unexplained infertility and with minimal or mild endometriosis-associated infertility, undergoing treatment with ovarian stimulation combined with artificial insemination by husband. No differences were found between the unexplained infertile and the endometriosis group as to patient characteristics, response to ovarian stimulation and semen qualities. There was a significantly higher total pregnancy rate, with more multiple gestations, in the unexplained infertile compared with the endometriosis group. The difference in outcome could reflect differences in pathogenesis and aetiology for the two groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There have been numerous inconclusive studies examining the differences between unexplained and peritoneal endometriosis-associated infertility. Hence, the choice of artificial reproductive technique may be difficult. This prospective study compares outcome in couples with unexplained infertility and with minimal or mild endometriosis-associated infertility, undergoing treatment with ovarian stimulation combined with artificial insemination by husband. No differences were found between the unexplained infertile and the endometriosis group as to patient characteristics, response to ovarian stimulation and semen qualities. There was a significantly higher total pregnancy rate, with more multiple gestations, in the unexplained infertile compared with the endometriosis group. The difference in outcome could reflect differences in pathogenesis and aetiology for the two groups.

Key concepts: Endometriosis, Unexplained infertility, Infertility, Gynecology, Medicine, Obstetrics, Artificial insemination, Etiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Artificial insemination by husband in unexplained infertility compared with infertility associated with peritoneal endometriosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens