A sharp-based sandstone of the Viking Formation, Joffre Field, Alberta, Canada; criteria for recognition of transgressively incised shoreface complexes
James A. MacEachern, Brian A. Zaitlin, S. George Pemberton
Abstract
James A. MacEachern, Brian A. Zaitlin, S. George Pemberton
Abstract
Abstract The Viking Formation of the Joffre Field comprises parts of three discrete sequences. Sequence 2 overlies an erosional discontinuity, termed BD-1, which is incised into underlying marine parasequences of the informally named "Regional Viking". The surface represents a sequence boundary that was transgressively modified during subsequent relative sea-level rise, and is commonly demarcated by the Glossifungites ichnofacies. Up to three parasequences are truncated by BD-1. Sequence 2 comprises an incised sandstone body passing basinwards into a granule- to pebble-bearing sandy mudstone. A complete facies succession consists of a thin granule to pebble lag mantling BD-1, grading upwards into thoroughly bioturbated gritty sandy mudstone, through intensely burrowed muddy sandstone, and into interbedded hummocky cross-stratified sandstone and burrowed sandstone. The facies contain diverse and uniformly distributed, open-marine trace-fossil suites displaying an upward progression from archetypal Cruziana through proximal Cruziana and into mixed Skolithos-Cruziana assemblages. The succession is interpreted to reflect a weakly storm-influenced upper offshore to proximal lower-shoreface deposit. Incised shorefaces are allocyclically generated, and may be produced by forced regressive (falling stage), lowstand, or transgressive scenarios. Sequence 2 of the Joffre area is interpreted as a transgressively incised shoreface. It is distinguished from the other two sharp-based shoreface types largely on the basis of the extent of the erosional component of its basal discontinuity. In distal positions, BD-1 remains erosional even where it is overlain by facies deposited below fair-weather wave base. This is inconsistent with forced regressive and lowstand conditions because in weakly storm-influenced shorefaces, the regressive surface of erosion and the sequence boundary, respectively, pass into correlative conformities seaward of fair-weather wave base. Facies deposited below fair-weather wave base would therefore overlie the non-erosional correlative conformity surface. In a transgressive scenario, however, ravinement during erosional shoreface retreat generates an erosional discontinuity that may lie seaward of fair-weather wave base during subsequent progradation, because the surface was cut prior to progradation and while sea level was considerably lower. As a result, facies deposited below fair-weather wave base can overlie the erosional discontinuity.
OpenAlex reports 170 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The Viking Formation of the Joffre Field comprises parts of three discrete sequences. Sequence 2 overlies an erosional discontinuity, termed BD-1, which is incised into underlying marine parasequences of the informally named "Regional Viking". The surface represents a sequence boundary that was transgressively modified during subsequent relative sea-level rise, and is commonly demarcated by the Glossifungites ichnofacies. Up to three parasequences are truncated by BD-1. Sequence 2 comprises an incised sandstone body passing basinwards into a granule- to pebble-bearing sandy mudstone. A complete facies succession consists of a thin granule to pebble lag mantling BD-1, grading upwards into thoroughly bioturbated gritty sandy mudstone, through intensely burrowed muddy sandstone, and into interbedded hummocky cross-stratified sandstone and burrowed sandstone. The facies contain diverse and uniformly distributed, open-marine trace-fossil suites displaying an upward progression from archetypal Cruziana through proximal Cruziana and into mixed Skolithos-Cruziana assemblages. The succession is interpreted to reflect a weakly storm-influenced upper offshore to proximal lower-shoreface deposit. Incised shorefaces are allocyclically generated, and may be produced by forced regressive (falling stage), lowstand, or transgressive scenarios. Sequence 2 of the Joffre area is interpreted as a transgressively incised shoreface. It is distinguished from the other two sharp-based shoreface types largely on the basis of the extent of the erosional component of its basal discontinuity. In distal positions, BD-1 remains erosional even where it is overlain by facies deposited below fair-weather wave base. This is inconsistent with forced regressive and lowstand conditions because in weakly storm-influenced shorefaces, the regressive surface of erosion and the sequence boundary, respectively, pass into correlative conformities seaward of fair-weather wave base. Facies deposited below fair-weather wave base would therefore overlie the non-erosional correlative conformity surface. In a transgressive scenario, however, ravinement during erosional shoreface retreat generates an erosional discontinuity that may lie seaward of fair-weather wave base during subsequent progradation, because the surface was cut prior to progradation and while sea level was considerably lower. As a result, facies deposited below fair-weather wave base can overlie the erosional discontinuity.
Key concepts: Geology, Geomorphology, Field (mathematics), Mining engineering, Geochemistry, Mathematics, Pure mathematics