INTERNATIONAL TRADE: COMMERCIAL POLICY*
J. Peter Neary
Abstract
Open-access reader
J. Peter Neary
Abstract
Open-access reader
Following a brief historical introduction and a discussion of different types of\ncommercial policy, this paper reviews the arguments for and against trade protection. In the bench-mark case of a competitive, small, open economy, free trade maximizes aggregate national welfare, although some individual groups will lose unless compensation is actually paid. Guidelines for policy include the uniform reduction and "concertina" rules for tariff cuts, and the principle of targeting: corrective measures should be applied as close to the\nsource of the "distortion" as possible. Relaxing the bench-mark assumptions allows\nexceptions to the case for free trade: "optimal" tariffs to manipulate world prices; "strategic" tariffs or export subsidies when home firms engage in oligopolistic competition with foreign\nrivals; and infant industry protection to allow home firms benefit from learning by doing. Protection can also raise the growth rate, though it is less likely to raise welfare in a growing economy. Overall, with due allowance for some ambiguity, both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggest a pragmatic case for free trade. Finally, the paper notes the\npolitical pressures for and against protection, and the role of international institutions such as the GATT in underpinning moves towards freer trade.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Following a brief historical introduction and a discussion of different types of\ncommercial policy, this paper reviews the arguments for and against trade protection. In the bench-mark case of a competitive, small, open economy, free trade maximizes aggregate national welfare, although some individual groups will lose unless compensation is actually paid. Guidelines for policy include the uniform reduction and "concertina" rules for tariff cuts, and the principle of targeting: corrective measures should be applied as close to the\nsource of the "distortion" as possible. Relaxing the bench-mark assumptions allows\nexceptions to the case for free trade: "optimal" tariffs to manipulate world prices; "strategic" tariffs or export subsidies when home firms engage in oligopolistic competition with foreign\nrivals; and infant industry protection to allow home firms benefit from learning by doing. Protection can also raise the growth rate, though it is less likely to raise welfare in a growing economy. Overall, with due allowance for some ambiguity, both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggest a pragmatic case for free trade. Finally, the paper notes the\npolitical pressures for and against protection, and the role of international institutions such as the GATT in underpinning moves towards freer trade.
Key concepts: Commercial policy, Economics, Subsidy, Tariff, International economics, Trade barrier, Free trade, Allowance (engineering)