1996The British Journal of Social WorkRequires access

Decision Making in Child Protection

Richard D. Jones

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

A survey was undertaken of 701 decisions in ‘child protection’; and ‘child-care’ cases within one local authority. Decision making at four filter points in case career was analysed. Filter 1 was when the case was initially referred to social services, Filter 2 was when consideration was given to holding a case conference, Filter 3 was when a case conference was held, and Filter 4 was the review case conference following the initial case conference. The major risk factors which determined decisions were highlighted, and these were different at each filter level. The percentage of children who remained within the ‘child protection system’ after decisions were taken at each filter level was analysed and recorded. The research found that, based on the risk factor weightings given by the independent auditors, workers were appropriately discriminating between ‘child protection’ and ‘child-care’ cases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey was undertaken of 701 decisions in ‘child protection’; and ‘child-care’ cases within one local authority. Decision making at four filter points in case career was analysed. Filter 1 was when the case was initially referred to social services, Filter 2 was when consideration was given to holding a case conference, Filter 3 was when a case conference was held, and Filter 4 was the review case conference following the initial case conference. The major risk factors which determined decisions were highlighted, and these were different at each filter level. The percentage of children who remained within the ‘child protection system’ after decisions were taken at each filter level was analysed and recorded. The research found that, based on the risk factor weightings given by the independent auditors, workers were appropriately discriminating between ‘child protection’ and ‘child-care’ cases.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey was undertaken of 701 decisions in ‘child protection’; and ‘child-care’ cases within one local authority. Decision making at four filter points in case career was analysed. Filter 1 was when the case was initially referred to social services, Filter 2 was when consideration was given to holding a case conference, Filter 3 was when a case conference was held, and Filter 4 was the review case conference following the initial case conference. The major risk factors which determined decisions were highlighted, and these were different at each filter level. The percentage of children who remained within the ‘child protection system’ after decisions were taken at each filter level was analysed and recorded. The research found that, based on the risk factor weightings given by the independent auditors, workers were appropriately discriminating between ‘child protection’ and ‘child-care’ cases.

Key concepts: Filter (signal processing), Child protection, Audit, Actuarial science, Psychology, Business, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decision Making in Child Protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens