Decision Making in Child Protection
Richard D. Jones
Abstract
Richard D. Jones
Abstract
A survey was undertaken of 701 decisions in ‘child protection’; and ‘child-care’ cases within one local authority. Decision making at four filter points in case career was analysed. Filter 1 was when the case was initially referred to social services, Filter 2 was when consideration was given to holding a case conference, Filter 3 was when a case conference was held, and Filter 4 was the review case conference following the initial case conference. The major risk factors which determined decisions were highlighted, and these were different at each filter level. The percentage of children who remained within the ‘child protection system’ after decisions were taken at each filter level was analysed and recorded. The research found that, based on the risk factor weightings given by the independent auditors, workers were appropriately discriminating between ‘child protection’ and ‘child-care’ cases.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A survey was undertaken of 701 decisions in ‘child protection’; and ‘child-care’ cases within one local authority. Decision making at four filter points in case career was analysed. Filter 1 was when the case was initially referred to social services, Filter 2 was when consideration was given to holding a case conference, Filter 3 was when a case conference was held, and Filter 4 was the review case conference following the initial case conference. The major risk factors which determined decisions were highlighted, and these were different at each filter level. The percentage of children who remained within the ‘child protection system’ after decisions were taken at each filter level was analysed and recorded. The research found that, based on the risk factor weightings given by the independent auditors, workers were appropriately discriminating between ‘child protection’ and ‘child-care’ cases.
Key concepts: Filter (signal processing), Child protection, Audit, Actuarial science, Psychology, Business, Political science, Law