Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression
M.-F. Poirier, P Boyer
Abstract
M.-F. Poirier, P Boyer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients fail to respond to initial antidepressant therapy, which suggests a need for more effective drugs. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and paroxetine in 122 patients with non-chronic treatment-resistant depression. METHOD: In-patients or out-patients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for major depression in evolution for less than eight months, having a baseline HAM-D score > or = 18 and a HAM-D Item 3 score < 3 were eligible. Patients were required to have a history of resistance to two previous antidepressant treatments and a CGI improvement score of 3 at the beginning of treatment. Doses were adjusted to 200-300 mg/day for venlafaxine and 30-40 mg/day for paroxetine. RESULTS: For the observed-case analysis, the response rate was 51.9% for venlafaxine and 32.7% for paroxetine (P = 0.044), and a remission was achieved in 42.3% of venlafaxine-treated and 20.0% of paroxetine-treated patients (P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine showed some evidence of superiority to paroxetine in this difficult-to-treat patient population.
OpenAlex reports 186 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients fail to respond to initial antidepressant therapy, which suggests a need for more effective drugs. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and paroxetine in 122 patients with non-chronic treatment-resistant depression. METHOD: In-patients or out-patients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for major depression in evolution for less than eight months, having a baseline HAM-D score > or = 18 and a HAM-D Item 3 score < 3 were eligible. Patients were required to have a history of resistance to two previous antidepressant treatments and a CGI improvement score of 3 at the beginning of treatment. Doses were adjusted to 200-300 mg/day for venlafaxine and 30-40 mg/day for paroxetine. RESULTS: For the observed-case analysis, the response rate was 51.9% for venlafaxine and 32.7% for paroxetine (P = 0.044), and a remission was achieved in 42.3% of venlafaxine-treated and 20.0% of paroxetine-treated patients (P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine showed some evidence of superiority to paroxetine in this difficult-to-treat patient population.
Key concepts: Paroxetine, Venlafaxine, Antidepressant, Depression (economics), Internal medicine, Medicine, Adverse effect, Reuptake inhibitor