2007PubMedOpen access

Measuring the relative importance of Social Security benefits to the elderly.

T. Lynn Fisher

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Provided is a discussion of the cumulative effects of the measurement alternatives described in the three previous articles: considering family income of persons rather than aged units, using administrative data in place of survey reported data, and switching the data source from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The current-methodology CPS statistic of 17.9 percent of beneficiary aged units receiving all of their income from Social Security in 1996 falls to a substantially smaller estimated 4.5 percent of elderly beneficiary persons based on family income when using the SIPP and Social Security administrative data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Provided is a discussion of the cumulative effects of the measurement alternatives described in the three previous articles: considering family income of persons rather than aged units, using administrative data in place of survey reported data, and switching the data source from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The current-methodology CPS statistic of 17.9 percent of beneficiary aged units receiving all of their income from Social Security in 1996 falls to a substantially smaller estimated 4.5 percent of elderly beneficiary persons based on family income when using the SIPP and Social Security administrative data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Provided is a discussion of the cumulative effects of the measurement alternatives described in the three previous articles: considering family income of persons rather than aged units, using administrative data in place of survey reported data, and switching the data source from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). The current-methodology CPS statistic of 17.9 percent of beneficiary aged units receiving all of their income from Social Security in 1996 falls to a substantially smaller estimated 4.5 percent of elderly beneficiary persons based on family income when using the SIPP and Social Security administrative data.

Key concepts: Survey of Income and Program Participation, Social security, Beneficiary, Statistic, Current Population Survey, Survey data collection, Demographic economics, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measuring the relative importance of Social Security benefits to the elderly. — Research Paper | ScholarLens